Abstract
Skin cancer has become increasingly common among young adults; however, this population does not consistently adhere to recommended methods for preventing the disease. Interventions in college settings have relied on appearance-focused appeals and have not been able to examine the cumulative effect of multiple behavior change and skin cancer risk communication strategies. The goal of the current study was to examine the unique and combined impacts of personalized ultraviolet (UV) radiation photographs, genetic testing for skin cancer risk, and general skin cancer prevention education. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) skin cancer prevention education, (2) education + UV photo, (3) education + genetic testing, and (4) education + UV photo + genetic testing. Self-reported sun protection, tanning, and sunburn were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 1 month post-intervention. The findings indicated benefits of the interventions to skin cancer prevention behaviors in the overall sample; however, the combined (UV photo + genetic testing) intervention had the most consistent positive effects on behaviors. Intervention effects were distinct across seasons. These results suggest that interventions containing multiple skin cancer risk communication strategies hold promise in benefitting health-promoting behavior changes in an at-risk, young adult population.
Trial Registration Number: NCT03979872; Registered 6/5/2019.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fitzmaurice C et al (2019) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 5(12):1749–1768. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996
Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (2020) SEER Stat fact sheets: Melanoma of the skin[cited 2020 August 27]; Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html.
American Cancer Society (2021) Cancer Facts and Figures 2021. American Cancer Society: Atlanta
Armstrong BK, Kricker A (1993) How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Res 3(6):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008390-199311000-00002
Gandini S, Autier P, Boniol M (2011) Reviews on sun exposure and artificial light and melanoma. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 107(3): p. 362-6. 10.1016j.pbiomolbio.2011.09.011
Chang YM et al (2009) Sun exposure and melanoma risk at different latitudes: a pooled analysis of 5700 cases and 7216 controls. Int J Epidemiol 38(3):814–830. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp166
Fogel J, Krausz F (2013) Watching reality television beauty shows is associated with tanning lamp use and outdoor tanning among college students. J Am Acad Dermatol 68(5):784–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.055
Hillhouse J et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-focused intervention to prevent skin cancer. Cancer 113(11):3257–3266. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23922
Mahler HI et al (2013) Effects of photoaging information and UV photo on sun protection intentions and behaviours: a cross-regional comparison. Psychol Health 28(9):1009–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2013.777966
Heckman CJ et al (2016) Efficacy of an intervention to alter skin cancer risk behaviors in young adults. Am J Prev Med 51(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.008
Glanz K, Schoenfeld ER, Steffen A (2010) A randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention messages for adults: project SCAPE. Am J Public Health 100(4):735–741. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.155705
Kanetsky PA, Hay JL (2018) Marshaling the translational potential of MC1R for precision risk assessment of melanoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 11(3):121–124. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0255
Smit AK et al (2020) MC1R variants and associations with pigmentation characteristics and genetic ancestry in a Hispanic, predominately Puerto Rican, population. Sci Rep 10(1):7303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64019-y
Petty RE, Wegener DT (1999) The elaboration likelihood model: current status and controversies. Dual-process theories in social psychology. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, pp 37–72
Marteau TM, Weinman J (2006) Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Soc Sci Med 62(6):1360–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.005
Adams MA et al (2009) Season of interview and self-report of summer sun protection behaviors. Cancer Causes Control 20(2):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9229-3
International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC Handbook on cancer prevention. Volume 5: Sunscreens. 2001, Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization
Fitzpatrick TB (1988) The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 124(6):869–871. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008
Glanz K et al (2008) Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch Dermatol 144(2):217–222. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2007.46
Bowers J et al (2021) Sun exposure, tanning behaviors, and sunburn: examining activities associated with harmful ultraviolet radiation exposures in college students. J Prim Prev 42(5):425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00638-z
Gamble R et al (2012) Sun damage in ultraviolet photographs correlates with phenotypic melanoma risk factors in 12-year-old children. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(4):587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.922
Van Buuren, S. and K (2011) Groothuis-Oudshoorn, mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw, 1–68. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03.
Rubin DB (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 91(434):473–489. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291635
Persson S et al (2018) Appearance-based interventions to reduce UV exposure: a systematic review. Br J Health Psychol 23(2):334–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12291
Hay JL et al (2021) Behavioral and psychological outcomes associated with skin cancer genetic testing in Albuquerque primary care. Cancers 13(16):4053. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164053
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the following individuals who assisted with data collection and data processing: Kade Kofford, Kadyn Kimball, Manusheela Pokharel, Elizabeth A. Giorgi, Sean Upshaw, Julia Berger, Katy Nottingham, Kevin K. John.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Dave Overholt, the Utah Department of Health Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (Centers for Disease Control grant number 1NU58DP006321), the National Cancer Institute (NCI, K07CA196985; Y.P.W.), the Innovators Award from NCI (3DP2EB022360-01S1, J.D.J.), the Department of Dermatology (Y.P.W., D.G.) and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation (D.G.). This work was also supported by the Office of Communications, Genetic Counseling Shared Resource, and Cancer Biostatistics Shared Resource (P30CA042014). J.L.H. and J.G.H. were supported by NCI P30 CA008748; J.G.H. was supported by ACS MRSG-16-020-01-CPPB. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yelena P. Wu: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing –original draft, Writing –review & editing. Jada G. Hamilton: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, Writing –review & editing. Kimberly A. Kaphingst: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, Writing –review & editing. Jakob D. Jensen: Data curation, formal analysis, methodology, Writing –review & editing. Wendy Kohlmann: Resources, Writing –review & editing. Bridget G. Parsons: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing –review & editing. Helen M. Lillie: Data curation. Xuechen Wang: Data curation, formal analysis, Writing –original draft. Benjamin Haaland: Data curation, formal analysis, methodology, Writing –review & editing. Ali P. Wankier: Formal analysis, writing –review & editing. Douglas Grossman: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing –review & editing. Jennifer L. Hay: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing –original draft, Writing –review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Utah [IRB_00116807].
Consent to Participate/Consent to Publish
Informed consent for study participation and publishing of their data was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interests
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Y.P., Hamilton, J.G., Kaphingst, K.A. et al. Increasing Skin Cancer Prevention in Young Adults: the Cumulative Impact of Personalized UV Photography and MC1R Genetic Testing. J Canc Educ 38, 1059–1065 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02232-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02232-1