Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of mid-urethral tape complications: a retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/purpose of the study

Following mid-urethral tape insertion, for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), a proportion of women experience complications such as voiding dysfunction or tape erosion which fail to respond to conservative management approaches. These women thus require further surgical treatment. Our objective was to describe the outcomes of the surgical management of complications in these women.

Methods

This retrospective study describes the results obtained following the surgical management of mid-urethral tape complications. Twenty-nine consecutive women who required mid-urethral tape lysis, loosening or excision for tape-related complications in the period 2007–2017 were included. Primary outcomes were improvement in voiding dysfunction and resolution of pain, while secondary outcomes were evaluation of the recurrence of stress urinary incontinence and patient satisfaction. Patient outcomes were measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire.

Results

There were 1459 mid-urethral tape procedures performed in the study period. Twenty-nine women (1.99%) who had revision surgery for tape complication were identified. Interventions included tape loosening or lysis in 19 women and tape excision in ten women. Twenty-three of the 29 patients reported a significant improvement in their symptoms postoperatively. Two women had a recurrence of SUI in the tape excision cohort; all patients following tape loosening or lysis remained continent.

Conclusions

Tape revision surgery is a safe and effective treatment for mid-urethral tape complications with the majority of women maintaining continence following revision. Early intervention and proactive management of complications, by the appropriate specialist, will improve outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lapitan MCM, Cody JD, Mashayekhi A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD002912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):567–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026Epub 2017 May 4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HG, Park HK, Paick SH, et al. Comparison of effectiveness between tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator tape (TOT) in patients with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0156306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Masata J, Svabik K, Zvara K, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1497–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3012Epub 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Valpas A, Ala-Nissila S, Tomas E, et al. TVT versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biardeau X, Zanaty M, Aoun F, et al. Approach and complications associated with suburethral synthetic slings in women: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Urol. 2016;26(4):254–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rehman H, Bezerra CA, Bruschini H, et al. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD001754.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moldovan CP, Marinone ME, Staack A. Transvaginal retropubic sling systems: efficacy and patient acceptability. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:227–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kociszewski J, Kolben S, Barski D, et al. Complications following tension-free vaginal tapes: accurate diagnosis and complications management. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:538391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drake M. Fundamentals of terminology in lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:S13–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, et al. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD006375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chevrot A, Droupy S, Coffin G, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of tension free vaginal tape in a historic cohort of 463 women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(6):827–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Synthetic midurethral slings: roles, outcomes and complications. Urol Clin N Am. 2019;46(1):17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdel-Fattah M, Cao G, Mostafa A. Long-term outcomes for transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in women with urodynamic mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):902–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kokanali MK, Doganay M, Aksakal O, et al. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;177:146–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glusto LL, Zahner PM, Goldman HB. Management of the exposed or perforated midurethral sling. Urol Clin N Am. 2019;46(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramart P, Ackerman AL, Cohen SA, et al. The risk of recurrent urinary incontinence requiring surgery after suburethral sling removal for mesh complications. Urology. 2017;106:203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Suzana Matias, who assisted with the tape lysis data. Dr. Ifeoma Offiah is a NIHR Clinical Lecturer and is thus sponsored by NIHR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ifeoma Offiah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ifeoma Offiah, Suneetha Rachaneni and Anupreet Dua declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The study was approved by the Audit, Assurance and Effectiveness Department of the University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust and performed with Good Ethical Standards. Reference Number: CA_2018-19-184. This department has an ethics committee for the approval of studies on humans.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The references should not be more than 10 years old.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dr. Ifeoma Offiah is a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Lecturer appointed by the University of Plymouth. Dr. Suneetha Rachaneni is a Consultant and Subspecialist Urogynaecologist. Dr. Anupreet Dua is a Consultant and Subspecialist Urogynaecologist, College Tutor and SST Program Director.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 99 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Offiah, I., Rachaneni, S. & Dua, A. Management of mid-urethral tape complications: a retrospective study. J Obstet Gynecol India 70, 152–157 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01269-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01269-5

Keywords

Navigation