Skip to main content
  • Educational Review
  • Open access
  • Published:

Primary myelofibrosis: spectrum of imaging features and disease-related complications

Abstract

Primary myelofibrosis is a chronic clonal stem cell disorder that results in a build-up of marrow fibrosis and dysfunction, hypermetabolic states, and myeloid metaplasia. The clinical and radiological consequences can be quite diverse and range from the manifestations of osteosclerosis and extramedullary haematopoiesis to thrombohaemorrhagic complications from haemostatic dysfunction. In addition, there is the challenge of identifying less well-recognised sites of extramedullary haematopoiesis and their site-specific complications. The intent of this article is to illustrate the spectrum of primary myelofibrosis as declared though multimodality imaging, with examples of both common and rarer disease manifestations.

Key points

  • Classic appearances of myelofibrosis include diffuse osteosclerosis, massive splenomegaly, and extramedullary haematopoiesis.

  • Thromboembolisms are a common complication of myelofibrosis and often occur in unusual areas.

  • Splanchnic vein thrombosis in a young patient raises suspicion of myeloproliferative neoplasm.

  • Massive splenomegaly may be complicated by spontaneous splenic infarction or haemorrhage.

Introduction

Myelofibrosis is a chronic clonal stem cell disorder, alongside other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) such as polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia, and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) [1]. Myelofibrosis commonly demonstrates well-described characteristic imaging features, namely diffuse osteosclerosis, massive splenomegaly, and extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH).

Epidemiology, clinical features, and presentations

The annual incidence of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is 0.4–1.4 per 100,000 population [2, 3] and shows a predilection for older males, although younger patients can be affected. Of the MPNs, PMF is the least common [4] but is associated with poorer survival, approximately 2 to 5 years upon diagnosis and symptom onset [5]. Patients may be asymptomatic and present following detection of incidental radiological findings or through discovery of anaemia, thrombocytosis, or thrombocytopaenia. In symptomatic patients, the clinical presentation varies from constitutional symptoms [4] to cardiovascular complications related to severe anaemia and thromboembolic events. Up to 10% of patients experience a thromboembolic event, most commonly venous thromboembolism [6]. Splenomegaly is an inevitable outcome and may lead to splenic infarction, haemorrhage, splanchnic vein thrombosis, portal hypertension, or mass effect symptoms [4, 7,8,9]. There is also a small risk of progression to acute myeloid leukaemia [10].

Imaging

Classical imaging appearances of myelofibrosis include diffuse osteosclerosis which often affects the entire axial and appendicular skeleton, massive splenomegaly, and EMH (Figs. 1 and 2). This triad of appearances, however, is not exclusive to myelofibrosis and can be found in other MPN and lymphoma.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Plain abdominal radiograph demonstrating diffuse increased osteosclerosis and a large left upper quadrant shadow consistent with massive splenomegaly (asterisk) in a patient with known primary myelofibrosis. There is marked displacement of the large and small bowel to the right by the spleen

Fig. 2
figure 2

Coronal CT of the abdomen demonstrating a markedly enlarged spleen (asterisk). The combination of osteosclerosis and massive splenomegaly has a narrow differential diagnosis and is most suggestive of myelofibrosis

Splenomegaly

Splenomegaly in PMF is caused by splenic EMH and is moderate to severe in about 75% of cases [4]. The dysregulation of the bone marrow microenvironment in PMF is a key feature of the disease and is characterised by the abnormal trafficking patterns of haematopoietic stem cells and haematopoietic progenitor cells. The cells migrate and are engrafted into sites external to the bone marrow, such the spleen, and expansion of the haematopoietic space from continuous proliferation of the malignant clones within the splenic microenvironment leads to progressive splenomegaly [11].

The upper limit of the spleen is defined as a craniocaudal length of 15 cm, 10 cm lateral width, or 6 cm anteroposterior dimension. The ‘splenic index’ is the product of width, depth, and length of the spleen (normal range 160–440 cm3) [12]. Splenomegaly is palpable in up to 90% of patients at the time of initial presentation [13], but at presentation, only about 25% are symptomatic, often with vague abdominal fullness or discomfort [4]. An abdominal radiograph may reveal an enlarged splenic opacity, which may provide a clue to underlying MPN, especially if large enough to displace the left renal opacity or bowel loops (Fig. 1). CT (Fig. 2) confirms the radiographic features of PMF, is the best modality for assessing the integrity of the spleen and vasculature, and allows for evaluation for other potential complications and PMF disease hallmarks such as EMH.

Extramedullary haematopoiesis

EMH occurs when an inadequate production of blood cells by the bone marrow necessitates production of blood cells in other source tissues. In the foetus, the yolk sac is the primary centre of blood cell production, followed by the spleen and liver. After birth, however, blood cell production occurs primarily in the bones [14]. In conditions where the marrow is replaced by fibrosis, EMH occurs. This most commonly occurs in PMF, but other examples of conditions causing a similar process include leukaemia, sickle cell disease, and thalassaemia [15].

In the thorax, EMH is most commonly seen as posterior mediastinal or paravertebral soft tissue masses (see Figs. 3 and 4). However, this would be regarded as a rare cause with the more likely differential diagnoses for posterior mediastinal masses being lymphoma, neurogenic tumours (often associated with rib splaying), and vascular anomalies (typically unilateral) [16]. On CT images, EMH is typically bilateral, smooth, and lobulated; may contain intralesional fat; and usually does not erode the adjacent bone. MRI chemical shift imaging may be helpful in identifying microscopic fat [15]. The second commonest presentation of EMH in the thorax is rib expansion, although intercostal space lesions are also an important imaging presentation (Fig. 5). Rarely, EMH can present as pulmonary nodules, masses, or fibrosis [17].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Coronal CT of the chest demonstrating extramedullary haematopoiesis in the posterior mediastinum, which typically appear as bilateral and symmetrical posterior mediastinal masses (white arrows)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Axial CT of the chest demonstrating extramedullary haematopoiesis in the posterior mediastinum, which typically appear as bilateral and symmetrical posterior mediastinal masses (white arrows). In the paravertebral regions, the soft tissue may compress the exiting nerves in the neural exit foramina or enter the vertebral canal, causing cord displacement or compression

Fig. 5
figure 5

Axial CT of the chest in another patient with myelofibrosis demonstrating soft tissue masses in the left and right intercostal spaces (asterisk), proven extramedullary haematopoiesis on histology. Note the bilateral bulky posterior mediastinal masses, also extramedullary haematopoiesis (white arrows)

In the abdomen, EMH most frequently occurs in the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes. Hepatosplenomegaly is the typical manifestation and is usually evident as diffuse organomegaly without a focal mass (Fig. 6) [18]. Splenomegaly is the most common manifestation of EMH in PMF, with palpable splenomegaly evident in over 80% of patients [13, 19]. Hepatomegaly is slightly less common and occurs in 39–65% of patients at the time of presentation [19, 20]. EMH in the liver or spleen may have different appearances on MRI depending on the underlying activity status. Lesions that are inactive and long-standing, or in patients treated with blood transfusions, may decrease in size and show features of extensive iron deposition, which manifests as increased signal on out-of-phase sequences relative to in-phase sequences. Chronic inactive lesions also possess a higher proportion of fat infiltration and iron deposition and so typically appear as T1 and T2 hypointense lesions with little or no enhancement. Active haematopoietic masses, on the other hand, have a greater proportion of erythroid and myeloid cells and less fat infiltration and iron deposition, and manifest more commonly as T1 intermediate and T2 hyperintense lesions, often with some enhancement [21, 22].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Portovenous phase axial (a) and coronal (b) CT of the abdomen in two different patients with myelofibrosis demonstrating osteosclerosis and massive splenomegaly. Note the presence of splenic varices and cavernous transformation of the portal vein on the axial image (a). Periportal low attenuation is also seen, consistent with periportal oedema and in keeping with portal hypertension. On the coronal image, linear low attenuation at the inferior aspect of the spleen is consistent with splenic infarction, another complication of massive splenomegaly

Periportal or peribiliary EMH can very closely resemble periportal oedema on CT, appearing as uniform low attenuation masses with clear margins. Both entities may also coexist in more advanced cases of PMF complicated by portal hypertension. A thick, lobulated appearance with soft tissue attenuation on CT may provide a differentiating factor against periportal oedema if periportal EMH is extensive (Fig. 7). On MRI, these generally appear as T1 hypointense and slightly T2 hyperintense, with heterogenously delayed enhancement [23, 24].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Axial CT demonstrating potential sites of extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) in the body. The commonest sites of involvement are the liver and spleen which manifest as hepatosplenomegaly. Less commonly, EMH may present in the periportal region (white arrows) and may be indistinguishable from periportal oedema. Clues to differentiating periportal EMH from periportal oedema include a more lobular appearance to EMH and soft tissue attenuation, whereas periportal oedema is generally less lobular and may have fluid attenuation

Perirenal EMH is another important site and typically appears as a thick rind of low attenuation homogenous soft tissue around the kidneys, lobulated but not typically causing significant renal contour deformity (Figs. 8 and 9). The main differential diagnoses for bilateral perirenal soft tissue abnormality to this extent include renal lymphoma and Erdheim-Chester disease; however, these are only distinguishable on biopsy [15].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Coronal CT demonstrating bilateral lobular perirenal soft tissue masses, contained by Gerota’s fascia and not causing contour deformity against the kidneys (white arrows), consistent with perirenal extramedullary haematopoiesis, a common site of extramedullary haematopoiesis in the abdomen. Note also the presence of periportal extramedullary haematopoiesis (black arrow) and splenomegaly (asterisk) in addition to osteosclerosis

Fig. 9
figure 9

Axial CT demonstrating bilateral lobular perirenal soft tissue masses, contained by Gerota’s fascia and often not causing contour deformity against the kidneys (white arrows), consistent with perirenal extramedullary haematopoiesis, a common site of extramedullary haematopoiesis in the abdomen

EMH in the central nervous system most commonly occurs as epidural soft tissue masses, within either the brain or the spine (Fig. 10). On MRI, EMH demonstrates heterogenous and variable T1 and T2 signal. Nuclear scintigraphy utilising 99mtechnetium-(Tc) sulphur colloid can assist in confirming EMH by identifying bone marrow elements within the masses [15].

Fig. 10
figure 10

T2-weighted MRI demonstrating bilateral posterior mediastinal masses (white arrows) consistent with extramedullary haematopoiesis. The soft tissue has intruded the right neural exit foramen and into the vertebral canal, causing effacement and mild displacement of the thoracic cord (black arrow)

Other rare sites of EMH involvement include the presacral region (Fig. 11), adrenal glands (Fig. 12), nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses, gastrointestinal or urinary tract, prostate, peritoneum, skin, breast, middle ear, lacrimal glands, and omentum [25, 26].

Fig. 11
figure 11

Presacral extramedullary haematopoiesis. a Sagittal. b T2. c Pre-contrast T1. d Post-contrast T1FS. e Axial post-contrast T1FS. f Fusion PET/CT with colour map. FDG-18 PET/CT MIP reconstruction demonstrating a presacral lesion with increased FDG uptake, consistent with presacral extramedullary haematopoiesis. Note the ‘superscan’ appearance from diffuse FDG uptake in the axial and appendicular skeleton (f)

Fig. 12
figure 12

Axial CT of the abdomen demonstrates symmetrical bulky and homogenous low attenuating masses in the adrenal glands (white arrows), consistent with extramedullary haematopoiesis in the adrenal glands. Note also similar attenuation bulky perihilar soft tissue consistent with periportal extramedullary haematopoiesis and splenomegaly (asterisk)

Osteosclerosis

In PMF, osteosclerosis occurs in 30–70% of cases and is diffused, usually affecting the entire axial and appendicular skeleton [27]. A chest or abdominal radiograph may incidentally demonstrate findings of diffuse osteosclerosis, which could alert an experienced clinician to an underlying systemic disease manifesting in the bones (Fig. 13). Common differential diagnoses include endocrine causes (e.g. hyperparathyroidism), prostate cancer for an older male, and breast cancer for a female; although if coupled with massive splenomegaly, an underlying MPN is suspected.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Chest radiograph demonstrating diffuse osteosclerosis in a patient with myelofibrosis. The symmetrical and diffuse appearances of osteosclerosis on plain radiographs are often subtle and difficult to identify

In the long bones, cortical thickening occurs due to endosteal sclerosis (Fig. 14) [28]. Periosteal reaction is rare and when present usually occurs at the metaphyses of the distal femur and proximal tibia (Fig. 15) [29]. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in PMF characteristically demonstrates intense and diffuse tracer uptake both in osteosclerotic bones and extraosseous sites of EMH, although this is a non-specific finding, and EMH in the liver and spleen is often well demonstrated on this modality especially when considerably enlarged (Fig. 16). Diffuse and intense osseous tracer uptake on nuclear bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-hydroxydiphosphonate (99mTc HDP) results in a ‘superscan’ appearance (Fig. 17). This is a term used on bone scan when activity in the bones is so profound that virtually, all tracer uptake becomes concentrated in the skeleton, and the usual physiological tracer concentration in the soft tissues and genitourinary tract becomes either markedly diminished or absent [30].

Fig. 14
figure 14

Lateral radiograph of a 62-year-old male with known primary myelofibrosis demonstrating endosteal sclerosis, the osteosclerotic pattern of myelofibrosis in the long bones (white arrows)

Fig. 15
figure 15

AP radiograph in the same patient demonstrates mild periostitis at the proximal tibial metaphysis, a rare feature of myelofibrosis (white arrows). Periostitis in myelofibrosis occurs at the metaphyseal regions of the distal femur or proximal tibia

Fig. 16
figure 16

18F-FDG PET/CT MIP image of a patient with myelofibrosis demonstrates diffuse FDG uptake in the bones. Note the presence of hepatosplenomegaly in the patient

Fig. 17
figure 17

99mTc Tc-99 m isotope HDP nuclear bone scan in a different patient demonstrates an appearance approaching a ‘superscan’ appearance due to intense skeletal tracer distribution. This case also provides a clue to the cause of skeletal uptake: note that the left kidney has been displaced inferiorly by an enlarged spleen from marked splenomegaly (black arrow). 99mTc-99 m nuclear bone scans may be helpful in identifying marrow presence in extramedullary sites of haematopoiesis

An excellent alternative tracer to FDG for PMF is 18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT PET, Fig. 18) [31]. With FDG, a more intense and widespread FDG uptake occurs at the earlier stage rather than later stage, due to the varied extent of fibrosis and inflammation present in the marrow in PMF [31]. In contrast to FDG, 18-FLT is able to directly assess myeloproliferative activity without the superimposed inflammatory component and, when performed at baseline, can be used to determine disease status or treatment outcome. In a retrospective review of patients with myelofibrosis, FLT PET/CT was found to predict response to therapy with targeted therapies (imatinib or JAK-2 inhibitors) and was also found to predict leukemic evolution [32].

Fig. 18
figure 18

18F-FLT PET in a patient with myelofibrosis demonstrating diffuse increased tracer uptake in the bones and enlarged spleen. 18F-FLT PET is an excellent alternative to FDG due to the ability to directly assess myeloproliferative activity without the superimposed inflammatory component of disease. 18F-FLT PET can also be used to determine disease status or treatment outcome when performed at baseline

On MRI, normal marrow in healthy adults is generally more T1 hyperintense and T2 hyperintense or isointense to the intervertebral disks (Fig. 19a, b). Due to replacement of marrow fat by collagen, reticulin fibres, and cellular material [28], the T1 and T2 signal of diseased bone in PMF becomes markedly hypointense, and the marrow appears more hypointense than the intervertebral disks (Fig. 19c, d). The differential diagnosis of osteosclerosis in the spine however is wide, and differentiating PMF against the other causes of osteosclerosis can be difficult, although in some pathologies, the vertebral appearances may have classic appearances, while in others, certain extraosseous features or clue from clinical history may help establish the diagnosis (see Table 1) [33].

Fig. 19
figure 19

Sagittal T1 (a) and T2 (b) MRI of the lumbar spine in a normal patient demonstrating normal marrow appearances. The vertebrae are homogenous, and the intervertebral disks are hypointense relative to the marrow. In contrast, the marrow signal in myelofibrosis appears markedly hypointense on both T1 (c) and T2 (d). The intervertebral disks also appear hyperintense relative to the marrow signal

Table 1 Differential diagnosis of osteosclerosis in the spine

Potential complications of primary myelofibrosis

Potential complications in PMF are multifaceted and arise from progressive marrow fibrosis and ineffective haematopoiesis, complications related to EMH and acute leukemic transformation. The most common complications are thrombohaemorrhagic and vascular. Other common complications include chronic hypertension, including pulmonary and portal hypertension, and splenic infarction.

Thromboembolic events

Overt thromboembolism, especially in unusual sites, is a common presentation in PMF. MPNs are now recognised as the leading systemic cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis [34] and affecting a younger age group in general. Some of the largest studies of MPN-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis studies reported a prevalence of underlying MPN in splanchnic vein thrombosis of up to 50% [35] with median age of 48 years [36]. Splanchnic vein thrombosis includes Budd-Chiari syndrome (Fig. 20), portal vein thrombosis (Fig. 21), or distal mesenteric venous thromboses (Fig. 22). Other venous thromboses include deep vein thromboses and/or pulmonary emboli and cerebral venous sinus thromboses (Fig. 23). Arterial embolisms are also common and include intracranial embolisms causing transient ischaemic events or cerebrovascular accidents (Fig. 24), angina or myocardial infarctions, and peripheral vascular disease. Thromboembolism affecting small vessels often manifests as migraine-type headaches, lightheadedness, paraesthesia, erythromelalgia, or atypical chest pains and is not often seen on imaging but is responsive to aspirin therapy [37].

Fig. 20
figure 20

Portovenous phase axial CT demonstrating Budd-Chiari syndrome in a patient with myelofibrosis. The middle hepatic vein (black arrow) and left hepatic vein (white arrow) are occluded and non-enhancing, and the inferior vena cava (not shown) is non-opacifying and slit-like. Note the early ‘nutmeg liver’ appearance in segment 7 which is a typical feature of Budd-Chiari syndrome

Fig. 21
figure 21

Axial (a) and coronal (b) CT demonstrating a filling defect within the portal vein (white arrows). Note the presence of splenomegaly in the patient (asterisk) and multiple splenic varices

Fig. 22
figure 22

Axial CT in the same patient demonstrates a filling defect within a branch of the superior mesenteric vein. Myeloproliferative neoplasms are now recognised as the leading systemic cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis [19] and affecting a younger age group in general

Fig. 23
figure 23

Coronal T2 MRI (a) demonstrating a filling defect in the right transverse sinus (white arrow). Maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstruction of an MRI intracranial venogram (b) demonstrates complete non-opacification of the right transverse sinus. This was due to a chronic right transverse sinus thrombosis in a patient with myelofibrosis

Fig. 24
figure 24

Axial CT intracranial angiogram demonstrates a filling defect within the basilar artery (black arrow) in a patient with myelofibrosis. Other multiple filling defects were seen in both vertebral arteries (not shown). Arterial embolisms are common in myelofibrosis and can result in transient ischaemic events, cerebrovascular accidents, angina or myocardial infarctions, and peripheral vascular disease

The clinical management of splanchnic vein thrombosis in PMF is particularly challenging with a typically younger age of patient at diagnosis, severity of short- and long-term outcomes of inadequate treatment, and balance against the risks of haemorrhage with treatment. A recent treatment algorithm for PMF [38] advises either observation and supportive therapy or allogenic stem cell transplantation or ruxolitinib (JAK inhibitor) treatment, depending on the overall PMF prognostic score [13].

Other complications of myelofibrosis

Progressive marrow fibrosis causes worsening cytopaenia which is itself accentuated further by pre-existing ineffective haematopoiesis. With a potentially expanded plasma volume from splenomegaly, severe anaemia can exacerbate pre-existing symptoms of tissue hypoxia in patients with vasculopathy or known cardiac failure—not uncommon in the comorbid population typically affected by PMF [19]. In thrombocytopaenia, the main risk is haemorrhage, which may be exacerbated by platelet dysfunction and concurrent varices. With leukopaenia, an increased risk of infection occurs in 22% of cases and carries a 9% mortality. The main pathogen is bacterial (78%) and usually of respiratory tract origin (52%), although viral and fungal organisms are also seen and other body systems can be a source of infection [39]. Gout can also occur due to the increased haematopoietic turnover.

As described above, EMH occurs in a variety of organs, most commonly in the liver and spleen. Marked enlargement of the spleen and liver may result in infarction (Fig. 25), mass effect symptoms, portal hypertension (Fig. 6), hypersplenism, plasma volume expansion, and splanchnic vein thrombosis (Figs. 20, 21, and 22). Severe organomegaly increases the risk of organ rupture with minor trauma or even spontaneously (Fig. 26). Atraumatic splenic rupture in general is rare but occurs most commonly in malignant haematological neoplasms [40]. Portal hypertension affects 7% of patients, due to increased hepatic blood flow, intrahepatic venous obstruction, and stasis with splenomegaly [41]. Hepatomegaly occurs in 39–65% of patients [19].

Fig. 25
figure 25

Axial portal venous phase CT of the abdomen demonstrates a markedly enlarged spleen with multiple wedge-shaped and linear areas of low attenuation consistent with splenic infarctions (white arrows). Marked enlargement of the spleen and liver may result in infarction, portal hypertension, hypersplenism, plasma volume expansion, and splanchnic vein thrombosis

Fig. 26
figure 26

Axial CT of the abdomen demonstrates a chronic subcapsular splenic haematoma in a markedly enlarged spleen (white arrow). Severe organomegaly increases the risk of organ rupture with minor trauma or even spontaneously

Summary

PMF is a disease with classic imaging appearances but also has complex appearances in advanced disease where there are several potential multi-organ complications. An understanding of the underlying disease process in PMF-associated osteosclerosis and EMH knowledge of the related complications especially splanchnic vein thromboses and other unusual thromboembolic locations allows for easier identification and differentiation of these disease-related complications from a wider differential diagnosis.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CML:

Chronic myeloid leukaemia

EMH:

Extramedullary haematopoiesis

FDG PET/CT:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

MPN:

Myeloproliferative neoplasm

PMF:

Primary myelofibrosis

References

  1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J (2017) WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Revised Fourth Edition. Available from: https://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?codlan=1&codcol=70&codcch=24002

  2. Mesa RA, Silverstein MN, Jacobsen SJ, Wollan PC, Tefferi A (1999) Population-based incidence and survival figures in essential thrombocythemia and agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: an Olmsted County study, 1976-1995. Am J Hematol 61:10–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kutti J, Ridell B (2001) Epidemiology of the myeloproliferative disorders: essential thrombocythaemia, polycythaemia vera and idiopathic myelofibrosis. Pathol Biol (Paris) 49:164–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meier B, Burton JH (2014) Myeloproliferative disorders. Emerg Med Clin North Am 32:597–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2014.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moulard O, Mehta J, Fryzek J, Olivares R, Iqbal U, Mesa RA (2014) Epidemiology of myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera in the European Union. Eur J Haematol 92:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbui T, Carobbio A, Cervantes F et al (2010) Thrombosis in primary myelofibrosis: incidence and risk factors. Blood 115:778–782. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-08-238956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy IG, Mitchell EL, Raso-Barnett L, Godfrey AL, Godfrey EM (2017) Imaging features of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Clin Radiol 72:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.05.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tefferi A (2003) The forgotten myeloproliferative disorder: myeloid metaplasia. Oncologist 8:225–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cervantes F (2011) How I treat splenomegaly in myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J 1:e37. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2011.36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Quintás-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, Pierce S, Cortes J, Verstovsek S (2013) Prognostic model to identify patients with myelofibrosis at the highest risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 13:315–318.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2013.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song MK, Park BB, Uhm JE (2018) Understanding splenomegaly in myelofibrosis: association with molecular pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vancauwenberghe T, Snoeckx A, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Vanhoenacker FM (2015) Imaging of the spleen: what the clinician needs to know. Singapore Med J 56:133–144. https://doi.org/10.11622/SMEDJ.2015040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A et al (2009) New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood 113:2895–2901. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Georgiades CS, Neyman EG, Francis IR, Sneider MB, Fishman EK (2002) Typical and atypical presentations of extramedullary hemopoiesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1239–1243. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts AS, Shetty AS, Mellnick VM, Pickhardt PJ, Bhalla S, Menias CO (2016) Extramedullary haematopoiesis: radiological imaging features. Clin Radiol 71:807–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.05.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Juanpere S, Cañete N, Ortuño P, Martínez S, Sanchez G, Bernado L (2013) A diagnostic approach to the mediastinal masses. Insights Imaging 4:29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0201-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bowling MR, Cauthen CG, Perry CD et al (2008) Pulmonary extramedullary hematopoiesis. J Thorac Imaging 23:138–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e31815b89aa

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sohawon D, Lau KK, Lau T, Bowden DK (2012) Extra-medullary haematopoiesis: a pictorial review of its typical and atypical locations. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 56:538–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02397.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mughal TI, Vaddi K, Sarlis NJ, Verstovsek S (2014) Myelofibrosis-associated complications: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and effects on outcomes. Int J Gen Med 7:89–101. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S51800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Verstovsek S, Atallah E, Mascarenhas J et al (2016) Efficacy of ruxolitinib on hepatomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis. Leukemia 30:1413–1415. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Mukundan G, Lewis JS Jr, Menias CO, Heiken JP (2005) MR imaging of the spleen: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 25:967–982. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.254045154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gabata T, Kadoya M, Mori A, Kobayashi S, Sanada J, Matsui O (2000) MR imaging of focal splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis in polycythemia vera: case report. Abdom Imaging 25:514–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Orphanidou-Vlachou E, Tziakouri-Shiakalli C, Georgiades CS (2014) Extramedullary hemopoiesis. Semin Ultrasound, CT, MRI 35:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jelali MA, Luciani A, Kobeiter H et al (2006) MRI features of intrahepatic extramedullary haematopoiesis in sickle cell anaemia. Cancer Imaging 6:182–185. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2006.0030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott WW Jr, Fishman EK (1990) Extramedullary hematopoiesis mimicking the appearance of carcinomatosis or peritoneal mesothelioma: computed tomography demonstration. Gastrointest Radiol 15:82–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mamlouk MD, Vansonnenberg E, Shankar S, Silverman SG (2011) Omental cakes: unusual aetiologies and CT appearances. Insights Imaging 2:399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0105-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bock O, Loch G, Schade U et al (2005) Osteosclerosis in advanced chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis is associated with endothelial overexpression of osteoprotegerin. Br J Haematol 130:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05573.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guermazi A, de Kerviler E, Cazals-Hatem D, Zagdanski AM, Frija J (1999) Imaging findings in patients with myelofibrosis. Eur Radiol 9:1366–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu JS, Greenway G, Rersnick D (1994) Myelofibrosis associated with prominent periosteal bone apposition report of two cases. Clin Imaging 18:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-7071(94)90040-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buckley O, O’Keeffe S, Geoghegan T et al (2007) 99mTc bone scintigraphy superscans: a review. Nucl Med Commun 28:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3281744440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vercellino L, Ouvrier MJ, Barré E et al (2017) Assessing bone marrow activity in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a pilot study of 18F-FLT PET. J Nucl Med 58:1603–1608. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.188508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Iravani A, Hofman M, Hicks R (2017) Clinical impact of haematopoiesis imaging with 18F-Fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT in patients with hematologic disorders or bone marrow compartment involvement. J Nucl Med 58:186

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mugera C, Suh KJ, Huisman TA et al (2013) Sclerotic Lesions of the Spine: MRI Assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1310–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Stefano V, Qi X, Betti S, Rossi E (2016) Splanchnic vein thrombosis and myeloproliferative neoplasms: molecular-driven diagnosis and long-term treatment. Thromb Haemost 115:240–249. https://doi.org/10.1160/th15-04-0326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Darwish Murad S, Plessier A, Hernandez-Guerra M et al (2009) Etiology, management, and outcome of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann Intern Med 151:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Stefano V, Vannucchi AM, Ruggeri M et al (2016) Splanchnic vein thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk factors for recurrences in a cohort of 181 patients. Blood Cancer J 6:e493. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2016.103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sekhar M (2017) Prevention and management of thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 15:178–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Finazzi G, De Stefano V, Barbui T (2018) Splanchnic vein thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: treatment algorithm 2018. Blood Cancer J 8:64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-018-0100-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Polverelli N, Breccia M, Benevolo G et al (2017) Risk factors for infections in myelofibrosis: role of disease status and treatment. A multicenter study of 507 patients. Am J Hematol 92:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Renzulli P, Hostettler A, Schoepfer AM, Gloor B, Candinas D (2009) Systematic review of atraumatic splenic rupture. Br J Surg 96:1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Alvarez-Larrán A, Abraldes JG, Cervantes F et al (2005) Portal hypertension secondary to myelofibrosis: a study of three cases. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2355–2358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50374.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Radiology and Nuclear Medicine technicians at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in this publication.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SFO conceived of the article and was the main author of the article. DS contributed to the nuclear imaging components of the article. THT edited the article for radiological content accuracy. GN and AL contributed cases, edited text and formatted figures. KB edited thecontent for clinical accuracy. JP was the supervising author, case contributor and text editor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheng Fei Oon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was granted for the publication of this study by the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Ethics Board (Project No. 18/187R).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oon, S.F., Singh, D., Tan, T.H. et al. Primary myelofibrosis: spectrum of imaging features and disease-related complications. Insights Imaging 10, 71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0758-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0758-y

Keywords