Skip to main content
Log in

Inbreeding and Research Productivity Among Sociology PhD Holders in Portugal

  • Published:
Minerva Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Portugal, research productivity is nowadays essential for the positive assessment of academics, research units and study programmes. Academic inbreeding has been highlighted in the literature as one of the factors influencing research productivity. This paper tests the hypothesis that inbreeding is detrimental for research productivity, measured through the number of publications listed in Scopus. The study resorts to a database provided by the national Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES), which comprises all academics teaching in all Portuguese institutions in the academic year 2015/2016. The sample selected for the analysis contains all academics with a PhD in Sociology (N=289). The study uses a special regression model for the analysis: the negative binomial logit hurdle. This was necessary given the large amount of academics with no publications or citations in Scopus, which were the dependent variables to assess research performance. The analysis provides separate results for the probability of inbred academics of having no papers/citations, and for the probability of producing more papers/citations than the non-inbred. Findings suggest that academic inbreeding, defined at the institutional level, has no negative effect on research productivity, contrary to what was expected. However, when defined at the national level, academic inbreeding is detrimental for the recognition and the impact of research: academics with a foreign PhD are more likely to have citations compared to academics who obtained their PhD in Portugal. A tendency was also noted that inbreeding might be more detrimental to research productivity in faculties of Economics than in Social Sciences and Humanities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alipova, Olga, and Andrey Lovakov. 2018. Academic inbreeding and publication activities of Russian faculty. Tertiary Education and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1395905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, Philip G., Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2015. Academic Inbreeding: Local Challenge, Global Problem. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, eds. Philip G. Altbach, Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley, 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, Tony, and Paul Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard. 1960. Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayol, Nicolas, and Mireille Matt. 2006. Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity. Information Economics and Policy 18: 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Filippo, Daniela, Elías Sanz Casado, and Isabel Gómez. 2009. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: A case study of a Spanish university. Research Evaluation 18(3): 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, Rosemary. 2016. Recent Research Evaluations in the UK and Portugal. In Global Challenges, National Initiatives, and Institutional Responses, eds. Cláudia Sarrico et al., 159–186. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DGEEC—Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. 2018. Inquérito ao potencial científico e tecnológico nacional—IPCTN16. Principais indicadores de I&D nacionais. Lisboa: Direção Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/206/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=897&fileName=IPCTN16_Destaques_Resultados_Globais.pdf. Accessed May 2018.

  • DGEEC—Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. 2017. Indicadores de Endogamia académica das instituições públicas de ensino universitário—2015/16. Lisboa: Direção Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fangmeng, Tian. 2016. Brain circulation, diaspora and scientific progress: A study of the international migration of Chinese scientists, 1998–2006. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 25(3): 296–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godechot, Olivier, and Alexandra Louvet. 2010. Academic Inbreeding: An Evaluation. Laviedesidees.fr. Retrieved from http://www.booksandideas.net/Academic-Inbreeding-An-Evaluation.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Gorelova, Olga, and Maria Yudkevich. 2015. Academic Inbreeding: State of the Literature. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, eds. Philip G. Altbach, Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley, 17–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heitor, Manuel, Hugo Horta, and Joana Mendonça. 2014. Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82: 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Jorge E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(46): 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, Hugo. 2013. Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: New insights for academic based research. Higher Education 65(4): 487–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, Hugo, Francisco M. Veloso, and Rócio Grediaga. 2010. Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science 56(3): 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, Hugo, Jisun Jung, and João M. Santos. 2018a. Effects of mobilities on the research output and its multidisciplinarity of academics in Hong Kong and Macau: An exploratory study. Higher Education Quarterly 72(3): 250–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, Hugo, and Maria Yudkevich. 2016. The role of academic inbreeding in developing higher education systems: Challenges and possible solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 113: 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, Hugo, Mattia Cattaneo, and Michele Meoli. 2018b. PhD funding as a determinant of PhD and career research performance. Studies in Higher Education 43(3): 542–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inanc, Ozlem, and Onur Tuncer. 2011. The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness. Scientometrics 88(3): 885–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katranidis, Stelios, Theodore Panagiotidis, and Costas Zontanos. 2017. Economists, research performance and national inbreeding: North versus south. Economic Notes: Review of Banking, Finance and Monetary Economics 46(1): 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, Vincent, Yves Gingras, and Éric Archambault. 2006. Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics 68(3): 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeys, Tom, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Olivia de Smet, and Ann Buysse. 2012. The analysis of zero-inflated count data: Beyond zero-inflated Poisson regression. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 65: 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02031.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, Rebecca G., William P. Bowers, Tim Barnett, and Michael C. White. 1998. Research Productivity of Graduates in Management: Effects of Academic Origin and Academic Affiliation. Academy of Management Journal 41: 704–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, Jack and Laure Turner. 2002. A look at individual differences in scientific research productivity: an econometric analysis of the publications of the French CNRS physicists in condensed matter (1980–1997). In Proceedings of the Conference Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy, SPRU, Brighton, March 21–23.

  • Musselin, Christine. 2004. Towards a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. Higher Education 48(1): 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Mike. 2014. Predicting scientific research output at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. South African Journal of Science 110: 01–04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, Laura Elena. 2008. How has Mexican faculty been trained? A national perspective and a case study. Higher Education 56(2): 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Shouan. 1993. A study of faculty inbreeding at eleven land-grant universities. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 10259. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10259.

  • Pechincha, Paula, António Marques, and José António Sarsfield Cabral. 2015. A universidade portuguesa nos rankings: estratégias de melhoria. Comunicar e Avaliar Ciência 57.

  • Pelz, Donald C., and Frank M. Andrews. 1996. Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puuska, Hanna-Mari, Reetta Muhonen, and Yrjö Leino. 2014. International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics 98(2): 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Jung Cheol, Jisun Jung, and Soo Jeung Lee. 2016. Academic inbreeding of Korean professors: Academic training, networks, and their performance. In Biographies and careers throughout academic life, eds. Jesús F. Galaz-Fontes et al., 187–206. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sin, Cristina, Orlanda Tavares, and Alberto Amaral. 2017. The impact of programme accreditation on Portuguese higher education provision. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(6): 860–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivak, Elizaveta, and Maria Yudkevich. 2015. Academic immobility and inbreeding in Russian universities. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education, eds. Maria Yudkevich, Philip G. Altbach, and Laura E. Rumbley, 130–155. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, Jens-Christian, and Sverre Try. 2005. Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education 46: 593–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Russell, and Vinod Mishra. 2014. Academic inbreeding in Australian law schools. Scientometrics 98(1): 583–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler, Manuel. 2001. How inbreeding affects productivity in Europe. Nature 411(6834): 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sologoub, Ilona, and Tom Coupé. 2015. Academic Inbreeding in Ukraine. In Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education, eds. Maria Yudkevich, Philip G. Altbach, and Laura E. Rumbley, 228–258. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, Orlanda, Sónia Cardoso, Teresa Carvalho, Sofia Branco Sousa, and Rui Santiago. 2015. Academic inbreeding in the Portuguese academia. Higher Education 69(6): 991–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, Orlanda, Vasco Lança, and Alberto Amaral. 2017. Academic Inbreeding in Portugal: Does Insularity Play a Role? Higher Education Policy 30(3): 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Jean C., and Clifton F. Conrad. 1984. Institutional inbreeding reexamined. American Educational Research Journal 21(1): 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeileis, Achim, Christian Kleiber, and Simon Jackman. 2008. Regression Models for Count Data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27(8): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Grant no. UID/CED/00757/2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orlanda Tavares.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavares, O., Sin, C. & Lança, V. Inbreeding and Research Productivity Among Sociology PhD Holders in Portugal. Minerva 57, 373–390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09378-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09378-1

Keywords

Navigation