Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructure-Based Model for Sharp Stress Raiser-Related Fatigue Stage Length Assessment

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

A model for evaluating the fatigue life of specimens/structure elements with sharp stress raisers/defects is presented. The model permits of computing the number of cycles to fatigue crack initiation and its growth from a sharp stress raiser to failure at a constant stress span with the only application of characteristics of static strength and microstructure of the initial material. The model can be used to assess the fatigue life of components that contain structural stress raisers and defects stemming from their manufacturing technique (surface roughness, surface cuts, scratches, and microcracks). The model reliability was verified with experimental results taken from the literature, calculations appeared to be in good agreement with experimental data. Fatigue curves to a grain-size crack initiation and to fracture of smooth specimens and those with a chemically-notched blunt raiser that simulates the casting defects in aircraft components were calculated. The two sets of specimens from a Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy differing in the cross-section (rectangular and cylindrical) and in microstructure (different grain sizes). Smooth specimens exhibited the test surface roughness Rv = 10 and 19 μm (average dent depth), which was assumed to be a sharp raiser for calculations. The model need not long-term and labor-consuming high-cycle fatigue tests to construct the fatigue curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. M. Herasymchuk, O. V. Kononuchenko, P. E. Markovsky, and V. I. Bondarchuk, “Calculating the fatigue life of smooth specimens of two-phase titanium alloys subject to symmetric uniaxial cyclic load of constant amplitude,” Int. J. Fatigue, 83, 313–322 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O. M. Herasymchuk, “Nonlinear relationship between the fatigue limit and quantitative parameters of material microstructure,” Int. J. Fatigue, 33, 649–659 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O. M. Herasymchuk, O. V. Kononuchenko, and V. I. Bondarchuk, “Fatigue life calculation for titanium alloys considering the influence of microstructure and manufacturing defects,” Int. J. Fatigue, 81, 257–264 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. S. Chan, “A microstructure-based fatigue-crack-initiation model,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 34, 43–58 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Lukáš and M. Klesnil, “Fatigue limit of notched bodies,” Mater. Sci. Eng., 34, 61–66 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Kitagawa and S. Takahashi, “Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or the cracks in the early stage,” in: Proc. of the Second Int. Conf. of Mechanical Behavior of Materials (August 16–20, 1976, Boston, MA), ASM, Metals Park, OH (1976), pp. 627–631.

  7. O. M. Herasymchuk, “Modified KT-diagram for stress raiser-involved fatigue strength assessment,” Strength Mater., 50, No. 4, 608–619 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. D. Chapetti, “Fatigue propagation threshold of short cracks under constant amplitude loading,” Int. J. Fatigue, 25, 1319–1326 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Maierhofer, H. P. Gänser, and R. Pippan, “Modified Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram accounting for finite notch depths,” Int. J. Fatigue, 70, 503–509 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. H. El Haddad, T. H. Topper, and K. N. Smith, “Prediction of non propagating cracks,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 11, No. 3, 573–584 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O. M. Herasymchuk, “Relationship between the threshold stress intensity factor ranges of the material and the transition from short to long fatigue crack,” Strength Mater., 46, No. 3, 368–374 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. S. Chan, “Variability of large-crack fatigue-crack-growth thresholds in structural alloys,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 35, 3721–3735 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. BS 7910:2005. Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures, British Standard, BSI (2205).

  14. R. W. Hertzberg, “A simple calculation of da/dN − ΔK data in the near threshold regime and above,” Int. J. Fracture, 64, R53–R58 (1993).

  15. O. M. Herasymchuk, “Microstructurally-dependent model for predicting the kinetics of physically small and long fatigue crack growth,” Int. J. Fatigue, 81, 148–161 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. J. McEvily, M. Endo, and Y. Murakami, “On the \( \sqrt{area} \) relationship and the short fatigue threshold,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 26, 269–278 (2003).

  17. K. Sadananda, S. Sarkar, D. Kujawski, and A. K. Vasudevan, “A two-parameter analysis of S–N fatigue life using Δσ and σmax,” Int. J. Fatigue, 31, 1648–1659 (2009).

  18. C. A. Rodopoulos, J.-H. Choi, E. R. de los Rios, and J. R. Yates, “Stress ratio and the fatigue damage map –Part I: Modelling,” Int. J. Fatigue, 26, 739–746 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. A. Rodopoulos, J.-H. Choi, E. R. de los Rios and J. R. Yates, “Stress ratio and the fatigue damage map – Part II: The 2024-T351 aluminium alloy,” Int. J. Fatigue, 26, 747–752 (2004).

  20. G. Léopold, Y. Nadot, T. Billaudeau, and J. Mendez, “Influence of artificial and casting defects on fatigue strength of moulded components in Ti-6Al-4V alloy,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 38, 1026–1041 (2015).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. M. Herasymchuk.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 3, pp. 47 – 61, May – June, 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herasymchuk, O.M., Novikov, A.I. Microstructure-Based Model for Sharp Stress Raiser-Related Fatigue Stage Length Assessment. Strength Mater 51, 361–373 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-019-00082-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-019-00082-9

Keywords

Navigation