Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Express-Method of Ranking of Polymer Materials by Energy Criterion Identification of Fracture Mode

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

To provide the functional adequacy, aesthetic qualities, and durability of the process of restoration of the elements of the dentofacial system, it is required to have the information on the properties of dental materials (physical, chemical, mechanical, technical, biological, etc). The method of acoustic emission is successfully used in the investigations of the materials’ properties providing live information on the development of damage or fracture. The dental polymers of the provisional prosthetic solution have been tested to determine their strength, plasticity, fracture toughness, water absorption, shrinkage, and microhardness. The authors have made a comprehensive ranking of polymers based on the experimental results. Using the energy identification criterion of fracture modes the percentage of brittle fracture for each material has been evaluated during tensile loading. The paper proposes a new express-method of the ranking of polymer materials, which allows one to significantly reduce material costs and time for experimental investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. D. Korol’, Material Science in Stomatology [in Ukrainian], Nova Knyga, Vinnytsia (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Ya. Pokrovskaya, Dental Material Science [in Russian], GÉOTAR-Media, Moscow (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. R. Skal’s’kyi, V. F. Makeev, O. M. Stankevych, et al., Method of Acoustic Emission in the Investigation of Dental Polymers [in Ukrainian], Kvart, Lviv (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Rakhshan, “Marginal integrity of provisional resin restoration materials: A review of the literature,” Saudi J. Dent. Res., 6, No. 1, 33–40 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Astudillo-Rubio, A. Delgado-Gaete, C. Bellot-Arcis, et al., “Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS One, 13, No. 2, e0193162 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O. M. Stankevych, “Use of wavelet transforms of acoustic emission signals for the assessment of macrofracture of structural materials,” Tekhn. Diagn. Nerazr. Contr., No. 1, 36–44 (2015).

  7. V. Skalskyi, V. Makeev, O. Stankevych, and R. Pavlychko, “Features of fracture of prosthetic toothendocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis,” Dent. Mater., 34, No. 3, e46–e55 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. Liu, H. Li, J. Li, et al., “An acoustic emission study on interfacial debonding in composite restorations,” Dent. Mater., 27, No. 9, 934–941 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. L. Lin, W. C. Kuo, J. J. Yu, et al, “Examination of ceramic restorative material interfacial debonding using acoustic emission and optical coherence tomography,” Dent. Mater., 29, No. 4, 382–388 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Yang, J. Guo, Q. Huang, et al., “Acoustic properties of interfacial debonding and their relationship with shrinkage stress in Class-I restorations,” Dent. Mater., 32, No. 6, 742–748 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K.-H. Kim, J.-H. Park, Y. Imai, and T. Kishi, “Fracture toughness and acoustic emission behavior of dental composite resins,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 40, Nos. 4–5, 811–819 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. K. Vallittu, “Use of woven glass fiber to reinforce a composite veneer. A fracture resistance and acoustic emission study,” J. Oral Rehabil., 29, No. 5, 423–429 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N.-S. Choi, J.-U. Gu, and K. Arakawa, “Acoustic emission characterization of the marginal disintegration of dental composite restoration,” Compos. Part A-Appl. S., 42, No. 6, 604–611 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. I. Ortega, A. Kaplan, M. P. Gomez, et al., “Characterization of metal/ceramic interfaces in dental materials by acoustic emission,” Proc. Mater. Sci., 8, 683–692 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. I. Ortega, M. I. L. Pumarega, N. Nieva, et al., “Adhesion study in metal-ceramic systems of dental restoration by acoustic emission,” Proc. Mater. Sci., 9, 477–483 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. R. Skal’s’kyi, V. F. Makeev, O. M. Stankevich, et al., “Strength evaluation of stomatologic polymers by wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals,” Strength Mater., 47, No. 4, 566–572 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. R. Skal’s’kyi, V. F. Makeev, O. M. Stankevych, et al., “Alternation of the types of fracture for dental polymers in different stages of crack propagation,” Mater. Sci., 50, No. 6, 836–843 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V. R. Skalsky, B. P. Klym, R. M. Plakhtiy, et al., “Portable system SKOP-8Ì for measurement and analysis of acoustic emission signals,” Sci. Innov., No. 3, 20–29 (2010), https://doi.org/10.15407/scin6.03.020.

  19. GOST 25.506-85. Strength Calculations and Tests. Methods of Mechanical Tests of Metals. Determination of Crack Resistance (Fracture Toughness) Characteristics under Static Loading [in Russian], Valid since March 27, 1985.

  20. V. M. Pestrikov and E. M. Morozov, Fracture Mechanics of Solid Bodies [in Russian], Professiya, Saint Petersburg (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. O. Stankevych and V. Skalsky, “Investigation and identification of fracture types of structural materials by means of acoustic emission analysis,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 164, 24–34 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Balkenhol, P. Ferger, M. C. Mautner, and B. Wöstmann, “Provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials: mechanical properties and degree of conversion,” Dent. Mater., 23, 1574–1583 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. R. Kerby, L. A. Knobloch, S. Sharples, and A. Peregrina, “Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 110, No. 1, 21–28 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Balkenhol, M. Meyer, K. Michel, et al., “Effect of surface condition and storage time on the repairability of temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials,” J. Dent., 36, No. 11, 861–872 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Balkenhol, H. Köhler, K. Orbach, and B. Wöstmann, “Fracture toughness of cross-linked and noncross-linked temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials,” Dent. Mater., 25, No. 7, 917–928 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Protemp TM 4, http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/597787O/protemp4-protempcrown-clinicalresults.pdf (accessed 21.05.2018).

  27. V. G. Chaika, L. M Muntyan, and T. I. Yushchenko, “Investigation of degree of water absorption of elastic materials for the production of two-layered bases of removable dentures,” Ortoped. Stomat., No. 2, 131–133 (2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. R. Skal’s’kyi or O. M. Stankevych.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 3, pp. 78 – 89, May – June, 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skal’s’kyi, V.R., Makeev, V.F., Stankevych, O.M. et al. Express-Method of Ranking of Polymer Materials by Energy Criterion Identification of Fracture Mode. Strength Mater 51, 388–397 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-019-00085-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-019-00085-6

Keywords

Navigation