Skip to main content
Log in

A bayesian approach to crop Model calibration under unknown error covariance

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bayesian methods seem well adapted to dynamic system models in general and to crop models in particular, because there is in general prior information about parameter values. The usefulness of a Bayesian approach has often been pointed out, but actual applications are rather rare. A major difficulty is including the elements of the covariance matrix of model errors in the treatment. We treat the specific case of balanced data and an unstructured covariance matrix. In our particular case this is a 3 × 3 matrix. We illustrate two methods for deriving a sample from the joint posterior density for the crop model parameters and the error covariance matrix parameters. The first method is based on importance sampling, the second on Metropolis within Gibbs sampling. We derive an instrumental density for the former and a proposal density for the latter which are adapted to this type of model and data. Both algorithms work well and they give very similar results. The example concerns a model for sunflowers during rapid leaf growth. The ultimate goal is to use the model as a decision aid in predicting disease risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brisson, N., Ruget, F., Gate, P., Lorgeou, J., Nicoullaud, B., Tayot, X., Plenet, D., Jeuffroy, M. H., Bouthier, A., Ripoche, D., Mary, B., and Justes, E. (2002), “STICS: A Generic Model for Simulating Crops and their Water and Nitrogen Balances. II. Model Validation for Wheat and Maize,” Agronomie, 22, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S., and Gelman, A. (1998), “General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke, P., and Peres, A. (2003), “Influence of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Crop Management on Phoma Black Stem (Phoma macdonaldii Boerema),” Crop Protection, 22, 741–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, A. M. (2004), “Bayesian Inference in Ecology,” Ecology Letters, 7, 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeland, K., Gottschalk, L., and Tallaksen, L. (2001), “Estimation of Regional Parameters in a Macro Scale Hydrological Model,” Nordic Hydrology, 32, 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. (2004), Bayesian Data Analysis, Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, M. J. W., and Hagenaars, T. J. (2004), “Calibration in a Bayesian Modelling Framework,” in Bayesian Statistics and Quality Modelling in the Agro-food Production Chain, eds. M. A. J. S. van Boekel, Stein A., and van Bruggen A.H.C., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. C., and O’Hagan, A. (2001), “Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 63, 425–464.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S. (2001), Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing, New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, D., Hillier, J., Wallach, D., Andrieu, B., and Jeuffroy, M. H. (2006), “Parameter Estimation for Crop Models,ŠŠ in Working with Dynamic Crop Models, eds. D. Wallach, D. Makowski, and J.W. Jones, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L., Nott, D., and Sharma, A. (2004), “A Comparative Study of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Modeling,ŠŠ Water Resources Research, 40, W02501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penciolelli, A., and Hue, C. (2005), “Global Sensitivity Analysis to Improve Models in Agronomy,ŠŠ in 1st Open International Conference on Modeling & Simulation, ISIMA / Blaise Pascal University, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C. P., and Casella, G. (2004), Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, (2007), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org.

  • Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M. (2000), Sensitivity Analysis, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F., and Wild, C. J. (1989), Nonlinear Regression, New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M. (2004), “Estimation des paramétres de modéles de Culture. Application au modéle STICS Tournesol,” unpublished doctoral thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Ecole doctorale Mathématiques et Applications.

  • Van Oijen, M., Rougier, J., and Smith, R. (2005), “Bayesian Calibration of Process-Based Forest Models: Bridging the Gap Between Models and Data,” Tree Physiology, 25, 915–927.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carine Hue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hue, C., Tremblay, M. & Wallach, D. A bayesian approach to crop Model calibration under unknown error covariance. JABES 13, 355–365 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571108X335855

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571108X335855

Key Words

Navigation