Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Small-scale diversity of Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) from an intertidal sandflat in the Jade Bay (German Bight, North Sea)

  • Published:
Senckenbergiana maritima Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Harpacticoid copepod assemblages from an intertidal sandflat in the Jade Bay (German Bight, North Sea) were investigated during a snapshot study, uncovering a relatively high small-scale organismic diversity: 1952 adult Harpacticoida of 32 species were recorded, belonging to 19 genera and 13 families. With 1232 adult specimens (63.1 %), Ectinosomatidae were the most abundant family, containingPseudobradya minor (T. & A.Scott) as the dominating species (57.4 %). For five species,Dactylopusia vulgaris (Sars),Remanea arenicola Klie,Mesochra pygmaea (Claus),Arenopontia subterranea Kunz, andEnhydrosoma gariene Gurney, the distributional range along the German coast line was extended to the area west of the river Elbe. Two species,Arenosetella tenuissima (Klie) andPseudobradya beduina Monard, were recorded for the first time in the Jade region. Most species recorded in our study are typical inhabitants of interridal sandy and/or muddy environments.

Taking into account different aspects of diversity (species richness: species numbers, estimated species numbers by Jack-knife 1 and 2, species richness plots; heterogeneity: Shannon index, rarefaction curves; phylogenetic/taxonomic relationship: taxonomic distinctness) we found only minor diversity differences between four investigated small spatial scales (circles from 18 cm to 20 m diameter). Hypothesis [a] stating increasing diversity with increasing scale had to be rejected. This unexpected result could be caused by the presence of a mosaic of more or less randomly arranged micropatches of species over the sampling domain. Obviously, all citcles were more or less within the range of a single ecological scale. A slight diversity change at the 20 m scale, mainly based on lower species density, may be due to changing tide, or to a beginning overlap of small-scale random micropatches by a larger-scale environmental pattern. Since we found only minor diversity changes from the smallest (centimetres) to the largest investigated scale (tens of metres), biotic and/or abiotic factors and processes acting at spatial scales of centimetres are assumed to be of special relevance for intertidal harpacricoid diversity.

Hypothesis [b] of no significant harpacticoid assemblage differences between the investigated scales was tested by ANOSIM for two similarity measures, leading to different results. Cosine similarity revealed no significant difference in assemblage composition between all possible pairwise combinations of circles, whereas [b] had to rejected for Bray-Curtis dissimilarity which produced significant results for two pairs (A/D, C/D). The difference between the test results is suggested to be caused by a lower species density in circle D, since Bray-Curtis dissimilarity is separating similar monitoring units if the difference is only due to multiples in abundance (Pfeifer et al. 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtziger, R., Nigmann, U. &Zwölfer, H. (1992): Rarefaction-Methoden und ihre Einsatzmöglichkeiten bei der zooökologischen Zustandsanalyse und Bewertung von Biotopen. — Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz,1: 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, Z.A. &Gauns, M.U. (1996): A quantitative analysis of fine scale distribution of intertidal meiofauna in response to food resources. — Indian Journal of Marine Science,25 (3): 259–263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armonies, W. &Reise, K. (2000): Faunal diversity across a sandy shore. — Marine Ecology Progress Series,196: 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azovsky, A.I. (2000): Concept of scale in marine ecology: linking the words or the worlds?. — Web Ecology,1:28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azovsky, A.I., Chertoprood, E.S., Saburova, M.A. &Polikarpov, I. G. (2004): Spatio-temporal variability of micro- and meiobenthic communities in a White Sea intertidal sandflat. — Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science,60: 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierkens, M.F.P., Finke, P.A. &Willigen, P.D. (2000): Upscaling and downscaling methods for environmental research. — 190 pp.; Dordrecht (Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blome, D., Schleier, U. &van Bernem, K.H. (1999): Analysis of the small-scale spatial patterns of free-living marine nematodes from tidal flats in the East Frisian Wadden Sea. — Marine Biology,133 (4): 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, P. &Le Guellec, C. (1992): Meiobenthos of the Bay of Saint Brieuc (North Brittany, France). II Harpacticoid copepod diversity and species assemblages. — Oceanologica acta,15 (6): 673–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman, L.A. (1981): The meiofauna of the Ems estuary. — In:Dankers, N.,Kühl, H. &Wolff, W.J. (Eds.): Invertebrates of the Wadden Sea, Report 4 of the Wadden Sea working group: 153–157; Leiden.

  • Boxshall, G.A. &Halsey, S.H. (2004): An introduction to copepod diversity. — 1–966; London (The Ray Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J.R. &Curtis, J.T. (1957): An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. — Ecological Monographs,27:325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. &Overton, W.S. (1979): Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. — Ecology,60: 927–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K.R. &Green, R.H. (1988): Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. — Marine Ecology Progress Series,46: 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K.R. &Warwick, R.M. (1998): A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. — Journal of Applied Ecology,35 (4): 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K.R. &Warwick, R.M. (2001): Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. — 173 pp.; Plymouth (PRIMER-E).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus, C. (1863): Die freilebenden Copepoden mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fauna Deutschlands, der Nordsee und des Mittelmeeres. — 230 pp.; Leipzig (Wilhelm Engelmann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, F. (1893): Untersuchungen über die Thierwelt der Unterelbe. — Bericht der Commission für wissenschaftliche Untersuchung der Deutschen Meere, Kiel,6 (1887): 151–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, H.-U. (1985): Zur Harpacticidenfauna der Jade (innerer Teil) im Tidebereich. — Drosera,85 (2): 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, H.-U. (1990): Naupliar development of Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) and its significance for phylogenetic systematics. — Microfauna Marina,6: 169–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, H.-U. &Bresciani, J. (1993): Naupliar developmentStenhelia (Delavalia) palustris (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). — Ophelia,37(2): 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, H.-U., Schminke, H.K. &Pottek, M. (1991): A redescription ofTisbe furcata (Baird, 1837) (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and its phylogenetic relationships within the TaxonTisbe. — Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutions-Forschung,29: 433–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungan, J.L., Perry, J.N., Dale, M.R.T., Legendre, P., Citron-Pousty, S., Fortin, M.J., Jakomulska, A., Miriti, M. &Rosenberg, M.S. (2002): A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. — Ecography,25 (5): 626–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckman, J.E. &Thistle, D. (1988): Small-scale spatial pattern in meiobenthos in the San Diego Trough. — Deep-Sea Research,35 (9A): 1565–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J.M. (1983): Statistical Analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. — Freshwater biological association scientific publication,25: 1–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, A.M., Absalao, R.S. &Da Silva, V.M.A.P. (1997): The importance of cost-effectiveness sampling in the study of intertidal sandy beach meiofauna. — Tropical Ecology,38 (1): 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, S.E.G. (1981): Small-scale spatial distribution of meiofauna on a mud- and sandflat. — Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science,12 (4): 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J. &Dale, M.R.T. (2005): Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. — 1–365; Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • George, K.H. (2005): Sublittoral and bathyal Harpacticoida (Crustacea: Copepoda) of the Magellan region. Composition, distribution and species diversity of selected major taxa. — Scientia Marina69(Suppl. 2): 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, K.H. &Rose, A. (2004): First record of a monospecific harpacticoid fauna on a sandy beach. — Meiofauna Marina,13: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. &Ryan, P.D. (2001): PAST: Palaeontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. — Palaeontologica Electronica,4 (1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.P (1972a): Horizontal and vertical distribution of the interstitial harpacticoid copepods of a sandy beach. — Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K.,52: 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.P. (1972b): Seasonal changes in population density and vertical distribution of harpacticoid copepods on an intertidal sand beach. — Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K.,52: 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.P. (1972c): The distribution and ecology of the interstitial meiofauna of a sandy beach at Whitesand bay, East Cornwall. — Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K.,52: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte, J., Conslik, E., Ostling, A., Gree, J.L. &Smith, A.B. (2005): A theory of spatial structure in ecological communities at multiple spatial scales. — Ecological Monographs,75 (2): 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltshe, J.F. &Forrester, N.E. (1983): Estimating species richness using the Jackknife procedure. — Biometrics,39: 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R.P. &Thiel, H. (Eds.) (1988): Introduction to the study of meiofauna. — 488 pp.; Washington D.C. (Smithsonian Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.H. (1971): The nonconcept of species diversity: A critique and alternative parameters. — Ecology,52 (4): 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki, N. (1993): Distribution of meiobenthic copepods from various habitats in Pauatahanui Inlet, New Zealand. — New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research,27: 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, F. (1960): Notizen zur Copepodenfauna Nordwestdeutschlands. — Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bremen,35 (3): 438–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klie, W. (1913): Die Copepoda Harpacticoida des Gebietes der Unter- und Außenweser und der Jade. — Separate Schriften des Vereins für Naturkunde an der Unterweser,3: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klie, W. (1927): Die Copepoda Harpacticoida von Helgoland. — Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen N. F., Helgoland,16 (9): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klie, W. (1949): Harpacticoida (Copepoden) aus dem Bereich von Helgoland und der Kieler Bucht. I. — Kieler Meeresforschungen,6: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klie, W. (1950): Harpacticoiden (Copepoden) aus dem Bereich von Helgoland und der Kieler Bucht. IL. — Kieler Meeresforschungen,7:76–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, H. (1938): Die sandbewohnenden Copepoden von Helgoland. I. — Kieler Meeresforschungen,2: 223–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, H. (1949): Die sandbewohnenden Copepoden von Helgoland. IL. — Kieler Meeresforschungen,6: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, H. (1971): Verzeichnis der marinen und Brackwasser bewohnenden Harpacticoiden (Crustacea Copepoda) der deutschen Meeresküste. — Kieler Meeresforschungen,27 (1): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K. (1948): Monographie der Harpacticiden. — 1682 pp.; Königstein (Otto Koeltz).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. (1992): The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. — Ecology73: 1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Vincx, M., Herman, P.M.J. &Heip, C. (1997): Monitoring meiobenthos using cm-, m- and km-scales in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. — Marine Environmental Research,43 (4): 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, S. (1969): Harpacticoiden aus dem lenitischen Watt und den Salzwiesen der Nordseeküste. — Kieler Meeresforschungen,25(1): 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A.E. (2004): Measuring biological diversity. — 256 pp.; Oxford (Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAleece, N.,Lambshead, P.J.D.,Paterson, G.L.J. &Cage, J.D. (1997): BIODIVERSITY PRO v2.0. — http://www.sams.ac.uk/activities/downloads/guestbook.html

  • McIntyre, A.D. (1973): The meiofauna of a flatfish nursery ground. — Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K.,53 (1): 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A.D. &Warwick, R.M. (1984): Meiofauna techniques (Ch. 7). — In:Holme, N.A. &McIntyre, A.D. (Eds.): Methods for the study of marine benthos: 217–244; Oxford (Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, A., Erasmus, T. &Furstenberg, J.P. (1977): Migrations of sandy beach meiofauna. — Zoologica Africana,12 (2): 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, W. (1973): Zwei neue Harpacticoida (Crustacea) aus dem Eulitoral der Nordseeinsel Sylt. — Mikrofauna Meeresboden,17: 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, W. (1975): Systematik der Copepoda eines Sandstrandes der Nordseeinsel Sylt. — Mikrofauna Meeresboden,52: 43–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, W. (1976): Ökologie der Copepoda eines Sandstrandes der Nordseeinsel Sylt. — Mikrofauna Meeresboden,59: 453–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monard, A. (1935): Étude sur la faune des harpacticoides marins de Roscoff. — Travaux de la station biologique de Roscoff,13: 5–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, CG. (1979): The distribution and ecology of psammolittoral meiofauna around the Isle of Man. — Cahiers de Biologie Marine,20 (4): 383–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noodt, W. (1957): Zur Ökologie der Harpacticoida (Crust. Cop.) des Eulitorals der deutschen Meeresküste und der angrenzenden Brackgewässer. — Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere,46: 149–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson, E. (1992): Small-scale spatial distribution of marine meiobenthos: The effects of decaying macrofauna. — Oecologia,90 (1): 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. (1990): The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. — Ecology,71 (3): 1195–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. (1991): Patterns of species richness among North Carolina hardwood forests: tests of two hypotheses. — Journal of Vegetation Science,2: 361–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. &White, P.S. (1994): Scale dependence and the species-area relationship. — American Naturalist,144 (5): 717–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. (1974): The measurement of species diversity. — Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,5: 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, D., Bäumer, H.-P., Dekker, R. &Schleier, U. (1998): Statistical tools for monitoring benthic communities. — Senckenbergiana maritima,29 (1/6): 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinckney, J. &Sandulli, R. (1990): Spatial autocorrelation analysis of meiofaunal and microalgal populations on an intertidal sand-flat: Scale linkage between consumers and resources. — Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science,30 (4): 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppe, S.A. (1881): Ueber einen neuen Harpacticiden. — Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bremen,7: 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppe, S.A. (1884): Ein neues Copepoden-Genus aus der Jade. — Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bremen,9:57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppe, S.A. (1885): Die freilebenden Copepoden des Jadebusens I. — Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Bremen,9: 167–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reineck, H.-E. (Ed.) (1982): Das Watt. — Ablagerungs- und Lebensraum. — 185 pp.; Frankfurt a. M. (Kramer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, F. (1966): Die interstitielle Fauna im Elbe-Ästuar, Verbreitung und Systematik. — Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Suppl.,31 (1/2): 1–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sach, G. (1984): Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Rohöl und Rohöl/Tensid-Gemischen im Ökosystem Wattenmeer. XL Copepoda (Harpacticoidea). — Senckenbergiana maritima,16 (1/6): 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sach, G. &van Bernem, K.-H. (1996): Spatial patterns of harpacticoid copepods on tidal flats. — Senckenbergiana maritima,26 (3–6): 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G. &McGill, M.J. (1983): Introduction to modern information retrieval. — 448 pp.; New York (McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. (1968): Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. — American Naturalist,102 (925): 243–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. &Weaver, W. (1949): The mathematical theory of communication. — Urbana (University Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. (1979): Rarefaction as a distribution-free method of expressing and estimating diversity. — In:Grassle, J.F., Paitl, G.P., Smith, W. &Taillie, C. (Eds.): Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice: 159–1176; Fairland, Maryland (International Co-operative Publishing House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.P. &Van Belle, G. (1984): Nonparametric estimation of species richness. — Biometrics,40: 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, M., Herman, P.M.J., Moens, T., Widdows, J. &Vincx, M. (2001): Tidal migration of nematodes on an estuarine tidal flat (the Molenplaat, Scheide Estuary, SW Netherlands). — Marine Ecology Progress Series,224: 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J.H. &de Vos, A.P.C. (1960): Einige wirbellose Tiergruppen des Dollart-Ems-Estuarium. — Verhandlingen van het Koninklijk Nederlands Geologisch-Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap (Geologische série),19: 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, B., Fleecer, J.W. &Carney, R.S. (1993): Sediment micro-topography and the small-scale spatial distribution of meiofauna. — Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,167 (1): 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, C.M. &Palmer, M.A. (2000): What drives small-scale spatial patterns in lotie meiofauna communities?. — Freshwater Biology,44(1): 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timm, R. (1894a): Die Copepoden und Cladoceren Helgolands. — Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen N. F., Helgoland,1: 1–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, R. (1894b): Copepoden und Cladoceren. — Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen N. F., Helgoland,1: 363–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, R. (1903): Hamburgische Elb-Untersuchung. — VI. Copepoden. — Mitteilungen aus dem Naturkunde-Museum in Hamburg,20:291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, J.C. (1979): Rarefaction and rarefiction. — the use and abuse of a method in paleoecology. — Paleobiology,5 (4): 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bernem, K.-H. &Sach, G. (1999): Benthische Ruderfußkrebse. — In: Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer & Umweltbundesamt (Eds.): Umweltatlas Wattenmeer. Bd. 2. Wattenmeer zwischen Elb- und Emsmündung: 64–65; Stuttgart (Ulmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bernem, K.-H.,Schleier, U.,Sach, G. &Lübbe, T. (1995): Entwicklung einer langfristigen Umweltbeobachtungsstrategie für das Benthos. — GKSS-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht, Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Entwurf zum Forschungsbericht): 1–140.

  • Wagner, H.H. (2004): Direct multi-scale ordination with canonical correspondence analysis. — Ecology,85 (2): 342–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R.M. (1998): Scaling of marine biodiversity. — Océanis,24 (4): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiechmann, J. (1999): Populationsbiologie ausgewählter Harpacticoida (Copepoda, Crustacea) aus dem Rückseitenwatt von Spiekeroog. — Diploma thesis, University Oldenburg.

  • Wiens, J.A. (1992): Ecology 2000: an essay on future directions in ecology. — Ecological Society of America Bulletin,73 (3): 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, DZMB, Südsttand 44, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany

    Armin Rose

  2. AG Zoosystematik und Morphologic, Universität Oldenbuig, 26111, Oldenbuig, Germany

    Sybille Seifried

Authors
  1. Armin Rose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sybille Seifried
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Rose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, A., Seifried, S. Small-scale diversity of Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) from an intertidal sandflat in the Jade Bay (German Bight, North Sea). Senckenbergiana maritima 36, 109–122 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043724

Keywords

Search

Navigation