Skip to main content
Log in

Structural stability regardless of membership turnover? The added value of blockmodelling in the analysis of network evolution

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent to which the emergent structure of an organization remains the same, regardless of the turnover of the members, is one of the most interesting questions raised by the analyses of its evolution. This paper uses longitudinal network analysis to provide an answer to this question. Its shows the usefulness of combining both dynamics and comparative statics (here, blockmodelling) in the study of this evolution. An empirical study examines the evolution of the structure of the advice network among judges of the Commercial Court of Paris. The combination of dynamics and comparative statics answers the initial question: Radical structuralism turns out to be wrong. An answer depends on the dimensions of the structure on which observers focus. The pecking order in the advice network remains relatively stable, regardless of members’ turnover. However, social differentiation measured in terms of role relationships and division of work shows that the relational structure does not remain the same regardless of members’ turnover. Specifically, relational processes within the organization, such as collective learning, impose varying constraints on different kinds of members over time and the overall relational structure reflects these members’ changing reactions and responses to these constraints. Since the former vary, so do the latter, and so does the resulting emergent overall structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bapuji H., Crossan M.M.: From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research. Manag. Learn. 35, 397–417 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau P.M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer P., Huisman M., Snijders T.A.B., Steglich C.E.G., Wichers L.H.Y., Zeggelink E.P.H.: StOCNET: an open software system for the advanced statistical analysis of social networks (Version 1.7). ICS/SciencePlus, Groningen (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S.P., Cross R.: A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Manag. Sci. 49, 432–445 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass D.J.: Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 518–539 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casella G., George E.I.: Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Am. Stat. 46, 167–174 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross R., Borgatti S.P., Parker A.: Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network. Soc. Netw. 23, 215–235 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan M.M., Lane H.W., White R.E.: An organizational learning framework; from intuition to institution. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24, 522–537 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M., Crossan M., Nicolini D.: Organizational learning: debates past, present and future. J. Manag. Stud. 37, 783–796 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flandreau M., Jobst C.: The ties that divide: a network analysis of the international monetary system, 1890–1910. J. Econ. Hist. 65, 977–1007 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand A.E.: Gibbs sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95, 1300–1304 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M.T.: Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multi-unit companies. Org. Sci. 13, 232–248 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff M., Tsai W.: Social Networks and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D.: Cognitive social structures. Soc. Netw. 9, 109–134 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D.: Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 342–369 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K., Sparks J.: The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Org. Sci. 9, 285–305 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E.: Micropolitics of Knowledge. Communication and Indirect Control in Workgroups. Aldine-de Gruyter, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E.: Concurrence, coopération et flux de conseil dans un cabinet américain d’avocats d’affaires: Les échanges d’idées entre collègues. Revue Suisse de Sociologie. 21, 61–85 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E.: The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Mounier L.: Interlocking judges: on joint external and self-governance of markets. In: Buskens, V., Raub, W., Snijders, C. (eds) Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 20, pp. 267–296. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Pattison P.: Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations. Soc. Netw. 21, 67–90 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Van Duijn M.: Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Soc. Netw. 19, 375–397 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Lemercier C., Mounier L.: A spinning top model of formal structure and informal behaviour: dynamics of advice networks in a commercial court. Eur. Manag. Rev. 3, 113–122 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Mounier L., Snijders T., Tubaro P.: Réseaux et controverses: De l’effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures. Revue Française de Sociologie 49, 467–498 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald M.L., Westphal J.D.: Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 48, 1–32 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson J.M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki K., Snijders T.A.B.: Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockstructures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96, 1077–1087 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders T.A.B.: The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In: Sobel, M.E., Becker, M.P. (eds) Sociological Methodology, pp. 361–395. Basil Blackwell, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T.A.B.: Simulation-based statistical inference for evolution of social networks. Paper presented at the Sunbelt conference, Slovenia (2004)

  • Snijders, T.A.B.: Models for longitudinal network data. In: Carrington, P., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Chap. 11, Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

  • Snijders T.A.B., Huisman M.: Manual for SIENA version 1.95. of Statistics & Measurement Theory. ICS/Dept, University of Groningen, Groningen (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders T.A.B., Nowicki K.: Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockmodels for graphs with latent block structure. J. Classif. 14, 75–100 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders T.A.B., Nowicki K.: Manual for BLOCKS version 1.6. ICS/Dept of Statistics & Measurement Theory. University of Groningen, Groningen (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., Schweinberger, M., Huisman, M.: Manual for SIENA version 3.11. ICS, University of Groningen, Groningen. Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/stocnet (2007)

  • Škerlavaj M., Dimovski V.: Social network approach to organizational learning. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 22, 89–97 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaï W.: Social structure of coopetition within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Org. Sci. 13, 179–190 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S., Faust K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • White H.C., Boorman S.A., Breiger R.L.: Social structure from multiple networks I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 730–779 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Lazega.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazega, E., Sapulete, S. & Mounier, L. Structural stability regardless of membership turnover? The added value of blockmodelling in the analysis of network evolution. Qual Quant 45, 129–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9295-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9295-y

Keywords

Navigation