Abstract
The extent to which the emergent structure of an organization remains the same, regardless of the turnover of the members, is one of the most interesting questions raised by the analyses of its evolution. This paper uses longitudinal network analysis to provide an answer to this question. Its shows the usefulness of combining both dynamics and comparative statics (here, blockmodelling) in the study of this evolution. An empirical study examines the evolution of the structure of the advice network among judges of the Commercial Court of Paris. The combination of dynamics and comparative statics answers the initial question: Radical structuralism turns out to be wrong. An answer depends on the dimensions of the structure on which observers focus. The pecking order in the advice network remains relatively stable, regardless of members’ turnover. However, social differentiation measured in terms of role relationships and division of work shows that the relational structure does not remain the same regardless of members’ turnover. Specifically, relational processes within the organization, such as collective learning, impose varying constraints on different kinds of members over time and the overall relational structure reflects these members’ changing reactions and responses to these constraints. Since the former vary, so do the latter, and so does the resulting emergent overall structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bapuji H., Crossan M.M.: From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research. Manag. Learn. 35, 397–417 (2004)
Blau P.M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York (1964)
Boer P., Huisman M., Snijders T.A.B., Steglich C.E.G., Wichers L.H.Y., Zeggelink E.P.H.: StOCNET: an open software system for the advanced statistical analysis of social networks (Version 1.7). ICS/SciencePlus, Groningen (2006)
Borgatti S.P., Cross R.: A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Manag. Sci. 49, 432–445 (2003)
Brass D.J.: Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 518–539 (1984)
Casella G., George E.I.: Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Am. Stat. 46, 167–174 (1992)
Cross R., Borgatti S.P., Parker A.: Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network. Soc. Netw. 23, 215–235 (2001)
Crossan M.M., Lane H.W., White R.E.: An organizational learning framework; from intuition to institution. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24, 522–537 (1999)
Easterby-Smith M., Crossan M., Nicolini D.: Organizational learning: debates past, present and future. J. Manag. Stud. 37, 783–796 (2000)
Flandreau M., Jobst C.: The ties that divide: a network analysis of the international monetary system, 1890–1910. J. Econ. Hist. 65, 977–1007 (2005)
Gelfand A.E.: Gibbs sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95, 1300–1304 (2000)
Hansen M.T.: Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multi-unit companies. Org. Sci. 13, 232–248 (2002)
Kilduff M., Tsai W.: Social Networks and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)
Krackhardt D.: Cognitive social structures. Soc. Netw. 9, 109–134 (1987)
Krackhardt D.: Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 342–369 (1990)
Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K., Sparks J.: The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Org. Sci. 9, 285–305 (1998)
Lazega E.: Micropolitics of Knowledge. Communication and Indirect Control in Workgroups. Aldine-de Gruyter, New York (1992)
Lazega E.: Concurrence, coopération et flux de conseil dans un cabinet américain d’avocats d’affaires: Les échanges d’idées entre collègues. Revue Suisse de Sociologie. 21, 61–85 (1995)
Lazega E.: The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Lazega E., Mounier L.: Interlocking judges: on joint external and self-governance of markets. In: Buskens, V., Raub, W., Snijders, C. (eds) Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 20, pp. 267–296. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Lazega E., Pattison P.: Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations. Soc. Netw. 21, 67–90 (1999)
Lazega E., Van Duijn M.: Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Soc. Netw. 19, 375–397 (1997)
Lazega E., Lemercier C., Mounier L.: A spinning top model of formal structure and informal behaviour: dynamics of advice networks in a commercial court. Eur. Manag. Rev. 3, 113–122 (2006)
Lazega E., Mounier L., Snijders T., Tubaro P.: Réseaux et controverses: De l’effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures. Revue Française de Sociologie 49, 467–498 (2008)
McDonald M.L., Westphal J.D.: Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 48, 1–32 (2003)
McPherson J.M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)
Nowicki K., Snijders T.A.B.: Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockstructures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96, 1077–1087 (2001)
Snijders T.A.B.: The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In: Sobel, M.E., Becker, M.P. (eds) Sociological Methodology, pp. 361–395. Basil Blackwell, London (2001)
Snijders, T.A.B.: Simulation-based statistical inference for evolution of social networks. Paper presented at the Sunbelt conference, Slovenia (2004)
Snijders, T.A.B.: Models for longitudinal network data. In: Carrington, P., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Chap. 11, Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Snijders T.A.B., Huisman M.: Manual for SIENA version 1.95. of Statistics & Measurement Theory. ICS/Dept, University of Groningen, Groningen (2002)
Snijders T.A.B., Nowicki K.: Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockmodels for graphs with latent block structure. J. Classif. 14, 75–100 (1997)
Snijders T.A.B., Nowicki K.: Manual for BLOCKS version 1.6. ICS/Dept of Statistics & Measurement Theory. University of Groningen, Groningen (2004)
Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., Schweinberger, M., Huisman, M.: Manual for SIENA version 3.11. ICS, University of Groningen, Groningen. Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/stocnet (2007)
Škerlavaj M., Dimovski V.: Social network approach to organizational learning. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 22, 89–97 (2006)
Tsaï W.: Social structure of coopetition within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Org. Sci. 13, 179–190 (2002)
Wasserman S., Faust K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)
White H.C., Boorman S.A., Breiger R.L.: Social structure from multiple networks I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 730–779 (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazega, E., Sapulete, S. & Mounier, L. Structural stability regardless of membership turnover? The added value of blockmodelling in the analysis of network evolution. Qual Quant 45, 129–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9295-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9295-y