Abstract
The main focus of this article is the term “unnatural” in a narratological analysis of Sam Shepard’s Mad Dog Blues (1971) in the light of ‘possible worlds’ theory. The term is recently coined and, in Jan Alber’s definition, designates those physically, logically, and even humanly impossible scenarios and events—according to the cognitive model of possible worlds—that challenge our real world knowledge. Mad Dog Blues is deemed to be one of the most complicated, fast-moving, and vividly imaginative but also obscure and puzzling of Shepard’s plays. The play in postmodernist fashion teems with a simultaneous collage-like collection of different types of unnatural narratives and storyworlds. It starts with a self-reflexive postmodern list; confronts us with unnatural characters; deconstructs our real-world knowledge about time and temporal progress; and presents us with impossible spaces. The analysis of the play in this essay is based on Jan Alber’s reading strategies which are meant to naturalize the play’s unnatural narratives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This does not mean that the factual or historical figure really appear on stage. Marie-Laure Ryan (1991) in her groundbreaking book entitled Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory elaborated on this issue. One of her examples is the following: “the Napoleon of TAW [Textual Actual World (Fictional text)] is regarded as a counterpart of the Napoleon of AW [Actual World (where we live)], linked to him through what David Lewis calls a line of transworld identity” (52). Thus, Napoleon appearing in any fictional world is deemed to be the counterpart of the real one..
Alber attempts to demonstrate that although unnatural narratology is a very recent field in literary studies, unnaturalness itself is neither an innovation nor a phenomenon limited to 20th or twenty-first century texts. He explains that unnatural literature has always been popular due to its distinctive aptitude to “widen our cognitive horizon […], challenge our limited perspective on the world,” assisting us to experience scenarios which are otherwise impossible to see in our reality (“Diachronic Development”61–62). In fact, each literary period had its own form of unnaturalness.
Alber’s model “integrates and supersedes Doležel’s distinction between physical and logical impossibilities” and further adds human impossibilities as well (Alber 2016b, 25).
The play was first staged at Theatre Genesis at St. Mark's Church in the Bowery, New York on March 4, 1971 by Robert Glaudini. It was also performed in UC Irvine (December 1987), Chicago's Theatre of the Reconstruction (April 1988), and One Theatre Company, Austin, TX (August 2000).
References
Alber, J. (2009). Impossible storyworlds—and what to do with them. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies,1, 79–96.
Alber, J. (2013). Unnatural narratology: The systematic study of anti-mimeticism. Literature Compass,10(5), 449–460.
Alber, J. (2016a). Absurd catalogues: The functions of lists in postmodern fiction. Style,50(3), 342–358.
Alber, J. (2016b). Unnatural narrative: Impossible worlds in fiction and drama. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Alber, J., & Fludernik, M. (2010). Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses. Columbus: Ohio State UP.
Alber, J., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2013a). A poetics of unnatural narrative. Columbus: Ohio State UP.
Alber, J., Ivesren, S., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2013b). “What really is unnatural narratology?”. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies,5, 101–118.
Baudrillard, J. (1998). Paroxysm: Interviews with Philippe Petit. London: Verso.
Belknap, R. (2000). The literary list: A survey of its uses and deployments. Literary Imagination,2(1), 33–54.
Bell, A., & Alber, J. (2015). Ontological metalepsis and unnatural narratology. Journal of Narrative Theory,42(2), 166–192.
Bottoms, S. J. (1998). The theater of Sam Shepard, states of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Creedon, E. (2015). Sam Shepard and the aesthetics of performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilman, R. (1984). Introduction in Sam Shepard’s seven plays. New York: Dial Press.
Herman, D. (1999). Introduction. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narratologies: New perspectives on narrative analysis (pp. 1–30). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Nünning, A., & Sommer, R. (2008). Diegetic and mimetic narrativity: Some further steps towards a narratology of drama. In J. Pier & J. Á. García Landa (Eds.), Theorizing narrativity (pp. 331–354). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Ryan, M.-L. (2006). From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology, and narrative. Poetics Today, 27(4), 633–674.
Saddik, A. J. (2007). Contemporary American drama (Edinburgh critical guides to literature). Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
Shepard, S. (1984). Fool for love and other plays. New York: Dial Press.
Shepard, S. (1986). Unseen hand and other plays. Toronto: Bantam Books.
Siegel, M. (1982). Holy ghosts: The mythic cowboy in the plays of Sam Shepard. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature,36(4), 235–246.
Sommer, R. (2005). Drama and narrative. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 119–124). London and New York: Routledge.
Stambolian, G. (1974). Shepard’s Mad dog blues: A trip through popular culture. Journal of Popular Culture,1, 776–786.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pirnajmuddin, H., Amani, O. Unnatural narratives in Sam Shepard’s Mad Dog Blues. Neohelicon 46, 739–752 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-019-00479-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-019-00479-0