Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building actor-centric transformative capacity through city-university partnerships

  • Urban Transformative Capacity
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cities worldwide are rising to the challenge of sustainable development, calling for large-scale and fast-paced transformations towards sustainability. Urban sustainability challenges are now being reframed as a lack of capacity of individuals and organizations to carry out such socio-technical transformations. This article expands on transformative capacity literature by elucidating the concept of actor-centric transformative capacity. It focuses on the unique role city-university partnerships (CUPs) can play in catalyzing and supporting effective urban sustainability transformations. Two case studies on CUPs in Portland, Oregon and Tempe, Arizona are used to identify determinants of actor-centric transformative capacity, their role in the transformative capacity of urban systems, and how they are built through CUPs. The article concludes with strategies for building effective CUPs capable of building actor-centric transformative capacity among university actors and city administrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agterbosch, S., R.M. Meertens, and W.J. Vermeulen. 2009. The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13: 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J.H., F. Beaudoin, and B. Gilden. 2017. Building powerful partnerships: Lessons from Portland’s Climate Action Collaborative. Sustainability: The Journal of Record 10: 276–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avelino, F., and J. Rotmans. 2011. A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84: 191–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J.J., and R.R. Brown. 2012. Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79: 1340–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broto, V.C., and H. Bulkeley. 2013. A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change 23: 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. 2010. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, M.M., and W.B. Dabars. 2015. Designing the New American University. Baltimore: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, H., S.E. van der Leeuw, C.L. Redman, D.J. Meffert, G. Davis, C. Alfsen, and T. Elmqvist. 2010. Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39: 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. 2013. Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D.J., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, and C.J. Thomas. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7: 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.A., S.E. Park, W.N. Adger, K. Brown, and S.M. Howden. 2012. Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environmental Research Letters 7: 034022.

  • Miller, T., E. Goodling, C. Herrington, and J. Devlin. 2015. The community watershed stewardship program: Experiments in engagement and equity in Portland, OR. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 17: 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens, F., N. Frantzeskaki, L. Gorissen, and D. Loorbach. 2013. Urban Transition Labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M., K. O’Brien, and D. Matyas. 2015. Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change 133: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phares, D. (ed.). 2009. Governing metropolitan regions in the 21st century. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., and A. Wiek. 2012. Achievements and opportunities in initiating governance for urban sustainability. Environment and Planning C 30: 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., and A.D. Williams. 2010. Innovating the 21st-century university: It’s time. Educause Review 45: 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaman, K.H. 2002. Shifting sights: The cultural challenge of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 3: 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trencher, G.P., M. Yarime, and A. Kharrazi. 2013. Co-creating sustainability: Cross-sector university collaborations for driving sustainable urban transformations. Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trencher, G., X. Bai, J. Evans, K. McCormick, and M. Yarime. 2014. University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability. Global Environmental Change 28: 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat (= United Nations Human Settlements Programme). 2016. Urbanization and Development—Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016, Nairobi.

  • West, G. 2017. Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A. 2017. Building capacity in professionals and stakeholders to implement sustainability solutions strategies. Working Paper. Center for Global Sustainability and Cultural Transformation, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany, and Arizona State University.

  • Wiek, A., and B. Kay. 2015. Learning while transforming—solution-oriented learning for urban sustainability in Phoenix, Arizona. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 16: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., B. Kay, and N. Forrest. 2017. Worth the trouble?! An evaluative scheme for urban sustainability transition labs (USTL) and an application to the USTL in Phoenix, Arizona. In Urban sustainability transitions, ed. N. Frantzeskaki, L. Coenen, C. Broto, and D. Loorbach, 227–256., Routledge series on sustainability transitions London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., L. Withycombe, and C.L. Redman. 2011. Key competencies in sustainability—A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science 6: 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withycombe Keeler, L., F.D. Beaudoin, A.M. Lerner, B. John, R. Beecroft, A. Wiek, and D.J. Lang. 2018. Transferring sustainability solutions across contexts through city–university partnerships. Sustainability 10: 2966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withycombe Keeler, L., A. Gabriele, B.R. Kay, and A. Wiek. 2017. Future shocks and city resilience: Building organizational capacity for resilience and sustainability through game play and ways of thinking. Sustainability: The Journal of Record 10: 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withycombe Keeler, L., A. Wiek, D.J. Lang, M. Yokohari, J. van Breda, et al. 2016. Utilizing international networks for accelerating research and learning in transformational sustainability science. Sustainability Science 11: 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, M. 2016. Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities 51: 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, M., N. Frantzeskaki, and S. Maschmeyer. 2016. Cities, systems and sustainability: Status and perspectives for research on urban transformations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyborn, C. 2015. Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: Adaptive governance and connectivity conservation. Ecology and Society 20: 11.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the guest editors Marc Wolfram, Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea, Megan Farrelly, Monash University, Australia, and Sara Borgström, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, for the invitation and encouragement to pursue this manuscript. The authors acknowledge funding from the Global Consortium for Sustainability Outcomes (GCSO) during the grant period February 2017–January 2018. We would also like to thank our city collaborators in Portland, Karlsruhe, Tempe, and Mexico City for the productive collaborations through this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnim Wiek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keeler, L.W., Beaudoin, F., Wiek, A. et al. Building actor-centric transformative capacity through city-university partnerships. Ambio 48, 529–538 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1117-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1117-9

Keywords

Navigation