Abstract
We present a detailed study of Rayleigh–Bénard magnetoconvection with periodic gravity modulation and uniform vertical magnetic field. Linear stability analysis is carried out using Floquet theory to construct the stability boundaries in order to estimate the magnitude of forcing amplitude \(\epsilon \) required for having convection in the system for a fixed Rayleigh number Ra, wave number k and modulating frequency \(\Omega \). The effects of varying Prandtl number Pr and Chandrasekhar number Q on the threshold of convection are also investigated. A higher Pr value reduces the value of the threshold, whereas a higher Q value increases it. Bicritical states are also observed at which the minimum forcing amplitude needed for convection to begin occurs at two different k values in harmonic and sub-harmonic regions, respectively. We also construct a nonlinear Galerkin model and compare the results with those obtained from linear stability analysis. Two-dimensional (2D) oscillatory convection is observed at the onset, while quasiperiodic and chaotic behaviours are found at higher Ra values. 2D as well as nonlinear convective flow patterns are observed for primary and higher-order instabilities, respectively. Bifurcation diagrams with respect to different parameters such as \(\epsilon \), Ra and Q are provided for thorough understanding of the forced nonlinear system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chandrasekhar, S.: Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford University Press, London (1961)
Proctor, M.R.E., Weiss, N.O.: Magnetoconvection. Rep. Prog. Phys. 45, 1317–1379 (1982)
Nakagawa, Y.: Experiments on the inhibition of thermal convection by a magnetic field. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 240, 108–113 (1957)
Nakagawa, Y.: Experiments on the instability of a layer of mercury heated from below and subject to the simultaneous action of a magnetic field and rotation. II. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 249, 138–145 (1959)
Busse, F.H., Clever, R.M.: Stability of convection rolls in the presence of a vertical magnetic field. Phys. Fluids 25, 931–935 (1982)
Clever, R.M., Busse, F.H.: Nonlinear oscillatory convection in the presence of a vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 507–523 (1989)
Cioni, S., Chaumat, S., Sommeria, J.: Effect of a vertical magnetic field on turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. E 62, R4520–R4523 (2000)
Aurnou, J.M., Olson, P.L.: Experiments on Rayleigh–Bénard convection, magnetoconvection and rotating magnetoconvection in liquid gallium. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 283–307 (2001)
Dawes, J.H.P.: Localized convection cells in the presence of a vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 570, 385–406 (2007)
Podvigina, O.: Stability of rolls in rotating magnetoconvection in a layer with no-slip electrically insulating horizontal boundaries. Phys. Rev. E 81, 056322 (2010)
Basak, A., Raveendran, R., Kumar, K.: Rayleigh–Bénard convection with uniform vertical magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 90, 033002 (2014)
Fauve, S., Laroche, C., Libchaber, A.: Effect of a horizontal magnetic field on convective instabilities in mercury. J. Phys. Lett. 42, L455–L457 (1981)
Fauve, S., Laroche, C., Libchaber, A., Perrin, B.: Chaotic phases and magnetic order in a convective fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1774–1777 (1984)
Meneguzzi, M., Sulem, C., Sulem, P.L., Thual, O.: Three-dimensional numerical simulation of convection in low-Prandtl-number fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 182, 169–191 (1987)
Busse, F.H., Clever, R.M.: Traveling-wave convection in the presence of a horizontal magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A 40, 1954–1961 (1989)
Burr, U., Müller, U.: Rayleigh–Bénard convection in liquid metal layers under the influence of a horizontal magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 453, 345–369 (2002)
Yanagisawa, T., Yamagishi, Y., Hamano, Y., Tasaka, Y., Takeda, Y.: Spontaneous flow reversals in Rayleigh–Bénard convection of a liquid metal. Phys. Rev. E 83, 036307 (2011)
Hurlburt, N.E., Matthews, P.C., Proctor, M.R.E.: Nonlinear compressible convection in oblique magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 457, 933–938 (1996)
Julien, K., Knobloch, E., Tobias, S.M.: Nonlinear magnetoconvection in the presence of strong oblique fields. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 285–322 (2000)
Busse, F.H.: Generation of planetary magnetism by convection. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 12, 350–358 (1976)
Kuang, W., Bloxham, J.: An Earth-like numerical dynamo model. Nature 389, 371–374 (1997)
Glatzmaier, G.A., Roberts, P.H.: A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 91, 63–75 (1995)
Glatzmaier, G.A.: Numerical simulations of stellar convective dynamos. I. The model and method. J. Comput. Phys. 55, 461–484 (1984)
Cattaneo, F.: On the origin of magnetic fields in the quiet photosphere. Astrophys. J. 515, L39–L42 (1999)
Schekochihin, A.A., Cowley, S.C., Taylor, S.F., Maron, J.L., McWilliams, J.C.: Simulations of the small-scale turbulent dynamo. Astrophys. J. 612, 276–307 (2004)
Braithwaite, J.: A differential rotation driven dynamo in a stably stratified star. Astron. Astrophys. 449, 451–460 (2006)
Kim, D.H., Adornato, P.M., Brown, R.A.: Effect of vertical magnetic field on convection and segregation in vertical Bridgman crystal growth. J. Cryst. Growth 89, 339–356 (1988)
Ji, H., Terry, S., Yamada, M., Kulsrud, R., Kuritsyn, A., Ren, Y.: Electromagnetic fluctuations during fast reconnection in a laboratory plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 115001 (2004)
Reimerdes, H., Chu, M.S., Garofalo, A.M., Jackson, G.L., La Haye, R.J., Navratil, G.A., Okabayashi, M., Scoville, J.T., Strait, E.J.: Measurement of the resistive-wall-mode stability in a rotating plasma using active MHD spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 135002 (2004)
Hadad, K., Rahimian, A., Nematollahi, M.R.: Numerical study of single and two-phase models of water/Al2O3 nanofluid turbulent forced convection flow in VVER-1000 nuclear reactor. Ann. Nucl. Energy 60, 287–294 (2013)
Pal, P., Kumar, K.: Role of uniform horizontal magnetic field on convective flow. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 201 (2012)
Pal, P., Kumar, K., Maity, P., Dana, S.K.: Pattern dynamics near inverse homoclinic bifurcation in fluids. Phys. Rev. E 87, 023001 (2013)
Basak, A., Kumar, K.: A model for Rayleigh–Bénard magnetoconvection. Eur. Phys. J. B 88, 244 (2015)
Basak, A., Kumar, K.: Effects of a small magnetic field on homoclinic bifurcations in a low-Prandtl-number fluid. Chaos 26, 123123 (2016)
Stribling, T., Matthaeus, W.H.: Relaxation processes in a low-order three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics model. Phys. Fluids B 3, 1848–1864 (1991)
Ma, X., Karniadakis, G.E.: A low-dimensional model for simulating three-dimensional cylinder flow. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 181–190 (2002)
Linz, S.J., Lücke, M.: Convection in binary mixtures: a Galerkin model with impermeable boundary conditions. Phys. Rev. A 35, 3997–4000 (1987)
Sobh, N., Huang, J., Yin, L., Haber, R.B., Tortorelli, D.A., Hyland Jr., R.W.: A discontinuous Galerkin model for precipitate nucleation and growth in aluminium alloy quench processes. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 47, 749–767 (2000)
Gloerfelt, X.: Compressible proper orthogonal decomposition/Galerkin reduced-order model of self-sustained oscillations in a cavity. Phys. Fluids 20, 115105 (2008)
Rogers, J.M., McCulloch, A.D.: A collocation-Galerkin finite element model of cardiac action potential propagation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41, 743–757 (1994)
Mynard, J.P., Nithiarasu, P.: A 1D arterial blood flow model incorporating ventricular pressure, aortic valve and regional coronary flow using the locally conservative Galerkin (LCG) method. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 24, 367–417 (2008)
Dao, T.-S., Vyasarayani, C.P., McPhee, J.: Simplification and order reduction of lithium-ion battery model based on porous-electrode theory. J. Power Sources 198, 329–337 (2012)
Nair, R.D., Thomas, S.J., Loft, R.D.: A discontinuous Galerkin global shallow water model. Mon. Weather Rev. 133, 876–888 (2004)
Tanaka, S., Bunya, S., Westerink, J.J., Dawson, C., Luettich Jr., R.A.: Scalability of an unstructured grid continuous Galerkin based hurricane storm surge model. J. Sci. Comput. 46, 329–358 (2011)
Noack, B.R., Niven, R.K.: Maximum-entropy closure for a Galerkin model of an incompressible periodic wake. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 187–213 (2012)
Chen, Z., Dai, S.: Adaptive Galerkin methods with error control for a dynamical Ginzburg–Landau model in superconductivity. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38, 1961–1985 (2001)
Gresho, P.M., Sani, R.L.: The effects of gravity modulation on the stability of a heated fluid layer. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 783–806 (1970)
Wadih, M., Roux, B.: Natural convection in a long vertical cylinder under gravity modulation. J. Fluid Mech. 193, 391–415 (1988)
Murray, B.T., Coriell, S.R., McFadden, G.B.: The effect of gravity modulation on solutal convection during directional solidification. J. Cryst. Growth 110, 713–723 (1991)
Wheeler, A.A., McFadden, G.B., Murray, B.T., Coriell, S.R.: Convective stability in the Rayleigh–Bénard and directional solidification problems: high-frequency gravity modulation. Phys. Fluids 3, 2847–2858 (1991)
Clever, R., Schubert, G., Busse, F.H.: Two-dimensional oscillatory convection in a gravitationally modulated fluid layer. J. Fluid Mech. 253, 663–680 (1993)
Kumar, K., Tuckerman, L.S.: Parametric instability of the interface between two fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 279, 49–68 (1994)
Kumar, K.: Linear theory of Faraday instability in viscous liquids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 452, 1113–1126 (1996)
Volmar, U.E., Müller, H.W.: Quasiperiodic patterns in Rayleigh–Bénard convection under gravity modulation. Phys. Rev. E 56, 5423–5430 (1997)
Christov, C.I., Homsy, G.M.: Nonlinear dynamics of two-dimensional convection in a vertically stratified slot with and without gravity modulation. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 335–360 (2001)
Li, B.Q.: Stability of modulated-gravity-induced thermal convection in magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. E 63, 041508 (2001)
Venezian, G.: Effect of modulation on the onset of thermal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 243–254 (1969)
Rosenblat, S., Tanaka, G.A.: Modulation of thermal convection instability. Phys. Fluids 14, 1319–1322 (1971)
Ahlers, G., Hohenberg, P.C., Lücke, M.: Externally modulated Rayleigh–Bénard convection: experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 48–51 (1984)
Roppo, M.N., Davis, S.H., Rosenblat, S.: Bénard convection with time-periodic heating. Phys. Fluids 27, 796–803 (1984)
Bhadauria, B.S., Bhatia, P.K.: Time-periodic heating of Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Scr. 66, 59–65 (2002)
Bhadauria, B.S.: Combined effect of temperature modulation and magnetic field on the onset of convection in an electrically conducting-fluid-saturated porous medium. J. Heat Transf. 130, 052601 (2008)
Singh, J., Bajaj, R.: Temperature modulation in ferrofluid convection. Phys. Fluids 21, 064105 (2009)
Paul, S., Kumar, K.: Effect of magnetic field on parametrically driven surface waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 463, 711–722 (2006)
Yasir, M., Ahmad, S., Ahmed, F., Aqeel, M., Akbar, M.Z.: Improved numerical solutions for chaotic-cancer-model. AIP Adv. 7, 015110 (2017)
Aqeel, M., Ahmad, S.: Analytical and numerical study of Hopf bifurcation scenario for a three-dimensional chaotic system. Nonlinear Dyn. 84, 755–765 (2016)
Aqeel, M., Azam, A., Ahmad, S.: Control of chaos: Lie algebraic exact linearization approach for the Lü system. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 426 (2017)
Dias, F.S., Mello, L.F.: Hopf bifurcations and small amplitude limit cycles in Rucklidge systems. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2013, 1–9 (2013)
Dias, F.S., Mello, L.F., Zhang, J.-G.: Nonlinear analysis in a Lorenz-like system. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 11, 3491–3500 (2010)
Messias, M., de Carvalho Braga, D., Mello, L.F.: Degenerate Hopf bifurcations in Chua’s system. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 19, 497–515 (2009)
Marques, F., Lopez, J.M.: Taylor–Couette flow with axial oscillations of the inner cylinder: Floquet analysis of the basic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 348, 153–175 (1997)
Brambilla, A., Gruosso, G., Gajani, G.S.: Determination of Floquet exponents for small-signal analysis of nonlinear periodic circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 28, 447–451 (2009)
Watanabe, G., Mäkelä, H.: Floquet analysis of the modulated two-mode Bose–Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A 85, 053624 (2012)
Shin, J.-Y., Lee, H.-W.: Floquet analysis of quantum resonance in a driven nonlinear system. Phys. Rev. E 50, 902–909 (1994)
Lundh, E.: Directed transport and Floquet analysis for a periodically kicked wave packet at a quantum resonance. Phys. Rev. E 74, 016212 (2006)
Staliunas, K., Longhi, S., de Valcárcel, G.J.: Faraday patterns in Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 210406 (2002)
Carias, H., Beratan, D.N., Skourtis, S.S.: Floquet analysis for vibronically modulated electron tunneling. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 5510–5518 (2011)
Luter, R., Reichl, L.E.: Floquet analysis of atom-optics tunneling experiments. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053615 (2002)
Tanner, J.J., Maricq, M.M.: Floquet analysis of the far-infrared dissociation of a Morse oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4054–4064 (1989)
Guérin, S.: Complete dissociation by chirped laser pulses designed by adiabatic Floquet analysis. Phys. Rev. A 56, 1458–1462 (1997)
Cavagnero, M.J.: Floquet analysis of inelastic collisions of ions with Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A 52, 2865–2875 (1995)
Safaenili, A., Chimenti, D.E., Auld, B.A., Datta, S.K.: Floquet analysis of guided waves propagating in periodically layered composites. Compos. Eng. 5, 1471–1476 (1995)
Skjoldan, P.F., Hansen, M.H.: Implicit Floquet analysis of wind turbines using tangent matrices of a non-linear aeroelastic code. Wind Energy 15, 275–287 (2012)
Lee, B., Liu, J.Z., Sun, B., Shen, C.Y., Dai, G.C.: Thermally conductive and electrically insulating EVA composite encapsulants for solar photovoltaic (PV) cell. Express Polym. Lett. 2, 357–363 (2008)
Thual, O.: Zero-Prandtl-number convection. J. Fluid Mech. 240, 229–258 (1992)
Acknowledgements
I acknowledge the financial support from the Center of Excellence in Space Sciences India (CESSI) funded by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. I am grateful to my Ph.D. supervisor Prof. Krishna Kumar for learning different numerical techniques from him and to my father Tushar Kanti Basak for fruitful discussions. I am obliged to the anonymous referees whose valuable suggestions have helped improve the standard of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
The study was funded by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India via the Center of Excellence in Space Sciences India (CESSI).
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Appendices
Appendix I: The magnetohydrodynamic equations
The properties of the concerned magnetohydrodynamic system are as described in the first paragraph of Sect. 2. Let us have a look at how we arrive at the governing Eqs. 3–6 of our system. The equation of continuity is given by
while the equation of momentum transfer is given by
where P is the non-magnetic pressure, \(\rho \) is the density and \(\zeta \) is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid. The term \(\rho g {{\varvec{e_3}}}\) is the buoyant force in the system due to the constant temperature gradient across the layer of fluid. The term \({\varvec{f}}_L\) represents the Lorentz force which arises due to the application of the external magnetic field and is given by
Using Maxwell’s equations, the above can be written as
Substituting this, Eq. 39 can be written as
The magnetic induction equation is given by
which can be simplified as
Here, \(\sigma \) is the electrical conductivity of the fluid and relates to the magnetic diffusivity \(\lambda \) as \(\lambda =1/(\mu \sigma )\). The heat diffusion equation is given by
where \(C_V\), T, \(k_T\), and \(\chi \) are the specific heat at constant volume, temperature of the fluid, thermal conductivity of the fluid, and heat dissipation term in the fluid, respectively.
At this point, the Boussinesq approximation [1] comes in which is based on the smallness of the volume expansion coefficient \(\alpha \). Since the range of \(\alpha \) lies between \(10^{-3}\) and \(10^{-4}\) for most of the fluids, thus for small variation in temperature (\(<10^\circ \)), the variation in density is at the most 1\(\%\). Consequently, the variations of specific heat, thermal conductivity, viscosity, etc., are also of the same order. So, the variations of these quantities with the temperature are small, and they are considered to be constant except in the buoyancy term of the equation for momentum transfer. The order of magnitude of the buoyancy force is comparable with that of the inertial term and hence cannot be neglected. Under this approximation, the velocity field becomes solenoidal (from Eq. 38),
and the momentum and heat transfer equations become
and
respectively, where \(\nu =\zeta /\rho _0\) denotes the kinematic viscosity, \(\rho _0\) is the fluid density at the temperature \(T_0\) of the lower plate, \(\kappa =k_T/(\rho _0 C_V)\) is the thermal diffusivity and \(\delta \rho =-\rho _0 \alpha (T-T_0)\) is the change in density due to the change in temperature. In the conduction state, the velocity is zero and consequently, there are no currents in the fluid. The temperature \(T_s(z)\) in the conduction state of the fluid is independent of time and is given by
where the adverse temperature gradient across the fluid layer is given by \(\beta =\Delta T/d=(T_0-T_1)/d\). \(T_1\) is the temperature of the upper plate. The variation of fluid density in the vertical direction is given by
and the pressure distribution by
where \(P_s(z)\) is the pressure of the fluid in the conduction state, \(P_0\) is a constant pressure at the upper plate located at \(z=d\), and \(B_0\) is the magnitude of the applied external magnetic field. As soon as the convective state sets in, the fluid velocity becomes finite and the other quantities are modified as
where \(\delta \rho (x,y,z,t)\), \(\theta (x,y,z,t)\), p(x, y, z, t) and \({\varvec{b}}(x,y,z,t)\) denote the changes in density, temperature, pressure and the uniform magnetic field, respectively, due to the onset of convection. Please note that the convective pressure p also includes the change due to the induced magnetic field. For Boussinesq fluids, the change in density is given by \(\delta \rho = \rho _0 \alpha \theta \). Considering an external uniform magnetic field which is applied in the vertical direction \({\varvec{B}} = B_0{\varvec{e_3}} + {\varvec{b}}(x,y,z,t)\) and using the scaling factors as given in Sect. 2 for non-dimensionalization, the set of dimensionless equations come out to be
The four dimensionless control parameters as mentioned in Sect. 2 are thermal Prandtl number Pr, magnetic Prandtl number Pm, Chandrasekhar number Q and Rayleigh number Ra. In the limit \(Pm\rightarrow 0\) for the case of terrestrial fluids and modulating gravity, the above equations narrow down to the set of Eqs. 3–6.
Appendix II: The model
The 16-mode low-dimensional Galerkin model is presented below.
The values of the coefficients are given below.
\(a_1=\frac{1}{80(\pi ^2+k^2)}\), \(a_2=-80[(\pi ^2+k^2)^2+\pi ^2Q]\), \(a_3=80k^2Ra\), \(a_4=20\pi (\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(a_5=2\pi (17k^2-11\pi ^2)\), \(a_6=10(k^2-\pi ^2)\), \(a_7=20(\pi ^2-k^2)\), \(a_8=9\pi ^2-5k^2\), \(a_9=7\pi ^2-5k^2\), \(a_{10}=2(3\pi ^2-k^2)\), \(a_{11}=2(5k^2-\pi ^2)\), \(a_{12}=-4\pi \), \(a_{13}=-2\pi \), and \(a_{14}=-4\pi \).
\(b_1=\frac{1}{80(\pi ^2+5k^2)}\), \(b_2=-80[(\pi ^2+5k^2)^2+\pi ^2Q]\), \(b_3=400k^2Ra\), \(b_4=20\pi (5k^2+13\pi ^2)\), \(b_5=18\pi (5k^2+\pi ^2)\), \(b_6=3(13\pi ^2-25k^2)\), \(b_7=6(5k^2+\pi ^2)\), \(b_8=6(25k^2+3\pi ^2)\), \(b_9=20(3\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(b_{10}=10(5k^2-3\pi ^2)\), \(b_{11}=50(\pi ^2-k^2)\), \(b_{12}=18\pi \), and \(b_{13}=36\pi \).
\(c_1=\frac{1}{200(2\pi ^2+k^2)}\), \(c_2=-400[(2\pi ^2+k^2)^2+\pi ^2Q]\), \(c_3=200k^2Ra\), \(c_4=-20\pi (\pi ^2+11k^2)\), \(c_5=-200\pi (\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(c_6=-18\pi (5k^2+\pi ^2)\), \(c_7=-20\pi (\pi ^2+11k^2)\), \(c_8=10(4\pi ^2-k^2)\), \(c_9=10(k^2-4\pi ^2)\), \(c_{10}=3(5k^2-8\pi ^2)\), \(c_{11}=3(8\pi ^2-5k^2)\), and \(c_{12}=-18\pi \).
\(d_1=\frac{1}{80(\pi ^2+5k^2)}\), \(d_2=-80[(\pi ^2+5k^2)^2+\pi ^2Q]\), \(d_3=54\pi ^2(\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_4=-20\pi ^2(\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_5=100\pi (\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_6=-40\pi (\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_7=18\pi (\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_8=-16\pi (\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_9=-18\pi (\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_{10}=80\pi (\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(d_{11}=9(\pi ^2+5k^2)\), and \(d_{12}=18(\pi ^2+5k^2)\).
\(e_1=\frac{1}{10(2\pi ^2+k^2)}\), \(e_2=-20[(2\pi ^2+k^2)^2+\pi ^2Q]\), \(e_3=-2\pi ^2(2\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(e_4=2\pi ^2(2\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(e_5=-4\pi (2\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(e_6=-4\pi (2\pi ^2+k^2)\), and \(e_7=-5\pi (2\pi ^2+k^2)\).
\(f_1=-2k^2\), \(f_2=\frac{\pi ^2}{5}\), \(f_3=-\frac{\pi ^2}{5}\), \(f_4=-\frac{\pi }{20}\), \(f_5=-\frac{\pi }{20}\), \(f_6=-\frac{\pi }{10}\), and \(f_7=-\frac{\pi }{10}\).
\(g_1=-8k^2\), \(g_2=\frac{2}{5}\pi ^2\), \(g_3=-\frac{2}{5}\pi ^2\), \(g_4=\frac{4}{5}\pi \), \(g_5=\frac{4}{5}\pi \), and \(g_6=\pi \).
\(h_1=\frac{1}{80Pr}\), \(h_2=-80(\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(h_3=80\), \(h_4=20\pi Pr\), \(h_5=80\pi Pr\), \(h_6=20\pi Pr\), \(h_7=14\pi Pr\), \(h_8=-2Pr\), \(h_9=-20Pr\), \(h_{10}=10Pr\), \(h_{11}=10Pr\), \(h_{12}=-5Pr\), and \(h_{13}=-5Pr\).
\(i_1=\frac{1}{80Pr}\), \(i_2=-80(\pi ^2+5k^2)\), \(i_3=80\), \(i_4=60\pi Pr\), \(i_5=-40\pi Pr\), \(i_6=18\pi Pr\), \(i_7=80\pi Pr\), \(i_8=6Pr\), \(i_9=20Pr\), \(i_{10}=30Pr\), \(i_{11}=-10Pr\), \(i_{12}=-15Pr\), and \(i_{13}=10Pr\).
\(j_1=\frac{1}{40Pr}\), \(j_2=-80(2\pi ^2+k^2)\), \(j_3=40\), \(j_4=-30\pi Pr\), \(j_5=-14\pi Pr\), \(j_6=-30\pi Pr\), \(j_7=-20\pi Pr\), \(j_8=-14\pi Pr\), \(j_9=-9\pi Pr\), \(j_{10}=-20\pi Pr\), \(j_{11}=-9\pi Pr\), \(j_{12}=-3Pr\), \(j_{13}=-2Pr\), \(j_{14}=3Pr\), and \(j_{15}=2Pr\).
\(k_1=\frac{\pi }{4Pr}\), \(k_2=-16\pi \), \(k_3=-2Pr\), \(k_4=-2Pr\), \(k_5=-Pr\), and \(k_6=-Pr\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basak, A. Study of a periodically forced magnetohydrodynamic system using Floquet analysis and nonlinear Galerkin modelling. Nonlinear Dyn 94, 2763–2784 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4523-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4523-4