Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying yield gap for rice cropping systems in Lower Gangetic Plains

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rice crop production needs to be increased to meet the food demand of the growing global population by utilizing the limited available resources. Reducing yield gap between potential and actual farmers’ yields could be one of the promising options for increasing rice production. In order to quantify the yield gap of rice, field experiments were conducted at two different locations in the Lower Gangetic Plains. Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer model was used to quantify potential yield for analyzing the attainable yield gaps with respect to water limitation, agronomic managements, difference in transplanting dates and soil variability. The results showed that an attainable average yield gap of 0.33 t/ha in rainfed condition existed in farmers’ fields due to rice transplantation after 30th July, whereas the use of supplementary irrigations produced an average attainable yield gap of 0.86 t/ha in irrigated condition. Poor agronomic practices adopted by farmers may be causing the reduction in average yield of 0.29 t/ha. The yield gap due to different transplanting dates and agronomic managements suggested to identify yield optimum transplanting date of a cultivar and appropriate agronomic management strategy to reduce the yield gap. The soil variability contributed very less attainable yield gap (0.02–0.16 and 0.02–0.19 t/ha for rainfed and rainfed with subsequent irrigation, respectively), than other factors because of similar type of soil at the study sites. Results also suggested that farmers should emphasize more on management strategies such as quantity of N-fertilizers, timing of fertilizer applications, supplementary irrigation and transplanting date that might reduce the yield gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal PK, Hebbar KB, Venugopalan MV, Rani S, Bala A, Biswal A, Wani SP (2008) Quantification of yield gaps in rain-fed rice, wheat, cotton and mustard in India. ICRISAT, Global theme on Agro-ecosystems report, 43

  • Alam MM, Karim MR, Ladha JK (2013) Integrating best management practices for rice with farmers’ crop management techniques: a potential option for minimizing rice yield gap. Field Crops Res 144:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA working paper, FAO, Rome

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, p 300

  • Bauke SL, Landl M, Koch M, Hofmann D, Nagel KA, Siebers N, Schnepf A, Amelung W (2017) Macropore effects on phosphorus acquisition by wheat roots—a rhizotron study. Plant Soil 416:67–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boling AA, Bouman BAM, Tuong TP, Konboon Y, Harnpichitvitaya D (2011) Yield gap analysis and the effect of nitrogen and water on photoperiod-sensitive Jasmine rice in north-east Thailand. NJAS Wagening J Life Sci 58(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlaug NE (2000) The green revolution revisited and the road ahead. Special 30th anniversary lecture. Norwegian Nobel Institute, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova D, Goudriaan J, Bouma J, Epema GF (1999) Yield gap analysis in relation to soil properties in direct-seeded flooded rice. Geoderma 91(3):191–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG (2012) What do we need to know about global food security? Glob Food Secur 1(2):81–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT, Yang HS (2003) Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:315–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG, Grassini P, van Wart J (2010) Crop yield potential, yield trends, and global food security in a changing climate. In: Rosenzweig C, Hillel D (eds) Handbook of climate change and agroecosystems. Imperial College Press, London, pp 37–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chahal GBS, Sood A, Jalota SK, Choudhury BU, Sharma PK (2007) Yield, evapotranspiration and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in Punjab (India) as influenced by transplanting date of rice and weather parameters. Agric Water Manag 88(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deryng D, Sacks WJ, Barford CC, Ramankutty N (2011) Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duwayri M, Van Tran D (2000) Reflections on yield gaps in rice production: how to narrow the gaps. RAP Publication (FAO)

  • Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT, Fischer RA (1999) Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Sci 39(6):1544–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2009) Global agriculture towards 2050. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Van Velthuizen HT, Shah MM, Nachtergaele FO (2002) Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century: methodology and results

  • Fischer RA, Byerlee D, Edmeades GO (2009) Can technology deliver on the yield challenge to 2050. In: Expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050, p 46

  • Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry J, Guber AK, Ladoni M, Munoz JD, Kravchenko AN (2017) The effect of up-scaling soil properties and model parameters on predictive accuracy of DSSAT crop simulation model under variable weather conditions. Geoderma 287:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye KS, Mandal C (2000) Agro-ecological zones, their soil resource and cropping systems, status of farm mechanization in India. In: Cropping systems. Status of farm mechanization in India, pp 1–32

  • Godwin DC, Singh U (1998) Nitrogen balance and crop response to nitrogen in upland and lowland cropping systems. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 55–77

  • Haefele SM, Konboon Y (2009) Nutrient management for rainfed lowland rice in northeast Thailand. Field Crops Res 114(3):374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman Z, Gobbett D, Holzworth D, McClelland T, van Rees H, Marinoni O, Garcia JN, Horan H (2013) Reprint of quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: a case study of wheat in Australia. Field Crops Res 143:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom G, Jones JW, Wilkens PW, Porter CH, Hunt LA, Boote KJ, Singh U, Uryasev O, Lizaso JI, Gijsman AJ, White JW, Batchelor WD, Tsuji GY (2009) Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer version 4.5 [CD-ROM]. University of Hawaii, Honolulu

  • Hunt LA, Boote KJ (1998) Data for model operation, calibration, and evaluation. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 9–39

  • Hunt LA, Pararajasingham S, Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Imamura DT, Ogoshi RM (1993) GENCALC: software to facilitate the use of crop models for analyzing field experiments. Agron J 85(5):1090–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson PD, Porter JR, Wilson DR (1991) A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Res 27(4):337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Job E (2006) Yield gap of rice in Alappuzha district of Kerala. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 44(2):88–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborte AG, de Bie KC, Smaling EM, Moya PF, Boling AA, van Ittersum MK (2012) Rice yields and yield gaps in Southeast Asia: past trends and future outlook. Eur J Agron 36(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB (2013) The use of satellite data for crop yield gap analysis. Field Crops Res 143:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB (2009) Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:179–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood R, Meo M, Legates DR, Morrissey ML (2003) The CERES-Rice model-based estimates of potential monsoon season rainfed rice productivity in Bangladesh. Prof Geogr 55(2):259–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlos FA, Monzon JP, Mercau JL, Taboada M, Andrade FH, Hall AK, Jobbagy E, Cassman KG, Grassini P (2015) Potential for crop production increase in Argentina through closure of existing yield gaps. Field Crops Res 184:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Singh R, Raghuwanshi NS, Chatterjee C, Froebrich J (2013a) Spatial variability of climate change impacts on yield of rice and wheat in the Indian Ganga Basin. Sci Total Environ 468:S132–S138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Siderius C, Aberson K, Van der Ploeg M, Froebrich J (2013b) Short-term rainfall forecasts as a soft adaptation to climate change in irrigation management in North-East India. Agric Water Manag 127:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal MH (2011) Causes of yield gaps and strategies for minimizing the gaps in different crops of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res 36(3):469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller ND, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490(7419):254–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson GC, Rosegrant MW, Palazzo A, Gray I, Ingersoll C, Robertson R, Tokgoz S, Zhu T (2010) Food security, farming, and climate change to 2050. IFPRI, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Nhamo N, Rodenburg J, Zenna N, Makombe G, Luzi-Kihupi A (2014) Narrowing the rice yield gap in East and Southern Africa: using and adapting existing technologies. Agric Syst 131:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner TE, Cosh MH, Cuenca RH, Dorigo WA, Draper CS, Hagimoto Y, Kerr YH, Larson KM, Njoku EG, Small EE, Zreda M (2013) State of the art in large-scale soil moisture monitoring. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77(6):1888–1919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel DP, Das A, Munda GC, Ghosh PK, Bordoloi JS, Kumar M (2010) Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem. Agric Water Manag 97(9):1269–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak H, Ladha JK, Aggarwal PK, Peng S, Das S, Singh Y, Singh B, Kamra SK, Mishra B, Sastri ASRAS, Aggarwal HP, Das DK, Gupta RK (2003) Trends of climatic potential and on-farm yields of rice and wheat in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Res 80(3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1998) Soil water balance and plant water stress. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 41–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT, Singh U, Godwin DC, Bowen WT (1998) Cereal growth, development and yield. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 79–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Hall AJ, Bastiaansen WGM, Laborte AG, Milne AE, Sileshi G, Steduto P (2015) Yield gap analysis of rainfed and irrigated crops: methods and case studies. Water reports no. 41. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

  • Sayer J, Cassman KG (2013) Agricultural innovation to protect the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:8345–8348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MT (2001) Rosetta: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251(3):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekar I, Pal S (2012) Rice and wheat crop productivity in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India: changing pattern of growth and future strategies. Indian J Agric Econ 67(2):238–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2013) Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Glob Food Secur 2:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehfest E, Heistermann M, Priess JA, Ojima DS, Alcamo J (2007) Simulation of global crop production with the ecosystem model DayCent. Ecol Model 209:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart AM, Pame ARP, Silva JV, Dikitanan RC, Rutsaert P, Malabayabas AJB, Lampayan RM, Radanielson AM, Singleton GR (2016) Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Res 194:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka A, Saito K, Azoma K, Kobayashi K (2013) Factors affecting variation in farm yields of irrigated lowland rice in southern-central Benin. Eur J Agron 44:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timsina J, Pathak H, Humphreys E, Godwin D, Singh B, Shukla AK, Singh U (2004) Evaluation of, and yield gap analysis in rice using, CERES Rice Ver. 4.0 in Northwest India. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, vol 26, Brisbane, Australia

  • Timsina J, Godwin D, Humphreys E, Kukal SS, Smith D (2008) Evaluation of options for increasing yield and water productivity of wheat in Punjab, India using the DSSAT-CSM-CERES-WHEAT model. Agric Water Manag 95(9):1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ittersum MK, Rabbinge R (1997) Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input–output combinations. Field Crops Res 52:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crops Res 143:4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt C, Dobermann A, Abdulrachman S, Gines HC, Guanghuo W, Nagarajan R, Satawatananont S, Son TT, Tan PS, Simbahan GC, Olk DC (1999) Internal nutrient efficiencies of irrigated lowland rice in tropical and subtropical Asia. Field Crops Res 63(2):113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Ma B (2015) Integrated nutrient management (INM) for sustaining crop productivity and reducing environmental impact: a review. Sci Total Environ 512:415–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JY, Huffman ET (2004) EasyGrapher: software for graphical and statistical validation of DSSAT outputs. Comput Electron Agric 45(1):125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Xu YL, Lin ED, Xiong W, Chen XG (2009) Application of DSSAT crop model on prediction of potential yield of spring wheat in Ningxia. Agric Res Arid Areas 2:008

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JM, Yang JY, Liu S, Hoogenboom G (2014) An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data. Agric Syst 127:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Information Technology Research Academy, Government of India (Grant No. ITRA-Water Grant ITRA/15(69)/WATER/M2M/01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhankar Debnath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debnath, S., Mishra, A., Mailapalli, D.R. et al. Quantifying yield gap for rice cropping systems in Lower Gangetic Plains. Paddy Water Environ 16, 601–615 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0653-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0653-z

Keywords

Navigation