Abstract
Introduction
Over the last 20 years, the incidence of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures was increased, due to changes in the children’s daily activities. The healing times are different according to the chosen treatment and to other factors such as age, type of fracture, involvement of the soft tissues, and concomitance with other injuries.
Materials and methods
From 2000 to 2015, 38 pediatric patients with diaphyseal femoral fractures were surgically treated and enrolled in the study. The average age of the patients was between 3 and 15 years. Twenty-two patients were treated with endomedullary titanium nails (TEN) and the other 16 with external axial fixators. Comparing the two groups, radiographic images were taken to assess the fracture reduction and consolidation.
Results
The average follow-up was 14 months. The average time needed to remove the TEN nails was 5 months; while 2.5 months was the time to remove the external fixator. At the final follow-up, there were no differences between two groups in term of significant rotation defects, angulation, growth, and/or nonunion.
Conclusions
This study showed that TENS and external fixation have similar results in term of fracture healing and complication, even if patients treated with TENS are more satisfied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flynn John M, Schwend Richard M (2004) Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:347–359
Petković L, Djan I, Gajdobranski D, Marić D, Petković M (2011) Pediatric femur fractures, epidemiology and treatment. Vojnosanit Pregl 68(1):9–14
Kong H, Sabharwal S (2014) External fixation for closed pediatric femoral shaft fractures: where are we now? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(12):3814–3822
Ferguson J, Nicol RO (2000) Early spica treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J PediatrOrthop. 20(2):189–192
Berne D, Mary P, Damsin JP, Filipe G (2003) Femoral shaft fracture in children: treatment with early spica cast. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(7):599–604
Kosuge D, Barry M (2015) Changing trends in the management of children’s fractures. Bone Joint J 97-B(4):442–448
MacNeil JA, Francis A, El-Hawary R (2011) A systematic review of rigid, locked, intramedullary nail insertion sites and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in the skeletally immature. J Pediatr Orthop 31:377–380
Lanzetti RM, Caraffa A, Lupariello D, Ceccarini P, Gambaracci G, Meccariello L, Manfreda F, Maiettini D, Vicente CI, Scialpi M, Bisaccia O, Rinonapoli G, Bisaccia M (2018) Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(4):649–658
Lanzetti RM, Lupariello D, De Carli A, Monaco E, Guzzini M, Fabbri M, Vadalà A, Ferretti A (2017) Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(5):659–664
Lanzetti RM, Ciompi A, Lupariello D, Guzzini M, De Carli A, Ferretti A (2017) Safety of third-generation artificial turf in male elite professional soccer players in Italian major league. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27(4):435–439
De Carli A, Lanzetti RM, Ciompi A, Lupariello D, Vadalà A, Argento G, Ferretti A, Vulpiani MC, Vetrano M (2016) Can platelet-rich plasma have a role in Achilles tendon surgical repair? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(7):2231–2237
Rathjen Karl E, Riccio Anthony I, De La Garza D (2007) Stainless steel flexible intramedullary fixation of unstable femoral shaft fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 27:432–441
Greene Walter B (1998) Displaced fractures of the femoral shaft in children, unique features and therapeutic options. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:86–96
Stans AA, Morrissy RT, Renwick SE (1999) Femoral shaft fracture treatment in patients age 6 to 16 years. J Pediatr Orthop 19:222–228
Miner T, Carrolo KL (2000) Outcomes of external fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 20:405–410
Khan MI, Saqib M (2014) Outcome of external fixation in pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Pak J Surg 30(2):156–158
Metaizeau JP (2004) Stable elastic intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femur in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(7):954–957
Ozdemir HM, Yensel U, Senaran H et al (2003) Immediate percutaneous intramedullary fixation and functional bracing for the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 23:453–457
Buchholz IM, Bolhuis HW, Broker FH et al (2002) Overgrowth and correction of rotational deformity in 12 femoral shaft fractures in 3-6-year-old children treated with an external fixatior. Acta Orthop Scand 73:170–174
Sela Y, Hershkovich O, Sher-Lurie N, Schindler A, Givon U (2013) Pediatric femoral shaft fractures: treatment strategies according to age-13 years of experience in one medical center. J Orthop Surg Res 8:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-23
Khurram B, Humayun B (2006) Flexible intramedullary nailing versus external fixation of paediatric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 72:159–163
Sponseller PD (2002) Surgical management of pediatric femoral fractures [review]. Instr Course Lect 51:361–365
Wright JG, Wang EE, Owen JL, Stephens D, Graham HK, Hanlon M, Nattrass GR, Reynolds RA, Coyte P (2005) Treatments for paediatric femoral fractures: a randomised trial. Lancet 365(9465):1153–1158
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights
This type of study does not require any statement relating to studies on humans and animals. All patients gave the informed consent prior to being included into the study. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rollo, G., Guida, P., Bisaccia, M. et al. TEN versus external fixator in the management of pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures: evaluation of the outcomes. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28, 1421–1428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2201-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2201-3