Abstract
We examine the connection between interannual anomalies of sea surface temperature (SST) in the central and far-eastern equatorial Pacific associated with basin-scale and coastal El Niños. Variations of the SST anomalies in these two regions are largely coherent, meaning coastal El Niños mostly occur together with the commonly studied basin-scale El Niños. Of particular interest for this study though is the understanding of the coastal El Niños that are not accompanied by basin-scale El Niños or that follow basin-scale El Niños. Such coastal El Niños can have catastrophic societal consequences in western South America. We identify seven coastal El Niños during 1979–2017, namely 1983, 1987, 1998, 2008, 2014, 2015, and 2017. These coastal El Niños are driven by different mechanisms. The coastal El Niños in 1983, 1987 and 1998 occurred after basin-scale El Niños. A unique feature of such extreme basin-scale El Niños like in 1982–1983, 1986–1987, and 1997–1998 is an equatorially centered intertropical convergence zone during its decaying phase. As a result, positive SST anomalies persist, and sometimes even strengthen, in the eastern Pacific in the subsequent boreal spring/early-summer, leading to coastal El Niños. The coastal El Niños in 2014 and 2015 on the other hand resulted from westerly wind bursts in the western Pacific that forced downwelling Kelvin waves and a thermocline depression in the far eastern Pacific. The formation of coastal El Niños in 2008 and 2017 were associated with westerly surface wind anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific and largely driven by ocean surface heat flux anomalies. These two coastal El Niños occur during the warm phase of the seasonal cycle, so that warm SSTs are amplified and/or the warm season is extended along the west coast of South America. Thus, there is a wide variety of the coastal El Niños in terms of evolution, mechanism, and timing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An S-I, Jin F-F (2004) Why El Niño is stronger than La Niña. J Clim 17(12):2399–2412
Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res 112:C11007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798
Behringer DW (2005) The global ocean data assimilation system (GODAS) at NCEP. 11th symposium on integrated observing and assimilation systems for the atmosphere, oceans, and land surface (IOAS-AOLS), San Antonio, TX, Am. Meteor. Soc. 3.3 [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/87ANNUAL/webprogram/11IOAS.html]
Bjerknes J (1969) Atmospheric teleconnections from the equatorial Pacific. Mon Weather Rev 97:163–172
Capotondi A et al (2015) Understanding ENSO diversity. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:921–938
D’Arrigo R, Cook ER, Wilson RJ, Allan R, Mann ME (2005) On the variability of ENSO over the past six centuries. Geophys Res Lett 32:03711
Davey MK, Brookshaw A, Ineson S (2014) The probability of the impact of ENSO on precipitation and near-surface temperature. Clim Risk Manag 1:5–24
Deser C, Wallace JM (1987) El Niño events and their relation to the Southern Oscillation: 1925–1986. J Geophys Res 92:14189–14196
Frase B (2017) Peru’s floods teach tough lessons. Nature 544:405–406
Garreaud RD (2018) A plausible atmospheric trigger for the 2017 coastal El Niño. Int J Climatol. 38(S1):e1296–e1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5426
Hirst A, Hastenrath S (1983) Atmosphere–ocean mechanisms of climate anomalies in the Angola–tropical Atlantic sector. J Phys Oceanogr 13:1146–1157
Hoerling M, Kumar A, Zhong M (1997) El Niño, La Niña, and the nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J Clim 10:1769–1786
Hu S, Edorov AF (2016) Exceptionally strong easterly wind burst stalling El Niño of 2014. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:2005–2010
Hu Z-Z, Huang B (2007) Physical processes associated with tropical Atlantic SST gradient during the anomalous evolution in the southeastern ocean. J Clim 20(14):3366–3378
Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Jha B, Wang W, Huang B, Huang B (2012) An analysis of warm pool and cold tongue El Niños: air–sea coupling processes, global influences, and recent trends. Clim Dyn 38(9–10):2017–2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1224-9
Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Xue Y, Jha B (2014) Why were some La Niñas followed by another La. Niña? Clim Dyn 42(3–4):1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1917-3
Hu Z-Z, Kumar A, Huang B, Zhu J, Zhang R-H, Jin F-F (2017) Asymmetric evolution of El Niño and La Niña: the recharge/discharge processes and role of the off-equatorial sea surface height anomaly. Clim Dyn 49(7–8):2737–2748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3498-4
Huang B, L’Heureux M, Hu Z-Z, Zhang H-M (2016) Ranking the strongest ENSOs while incorporating SST uncertainty. Geophys Res Lett 43(17):9165–9172. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070888
Huang B, Thorne PW, Banzon VF, Boyer T, Chepurin G, Lawrimore JH, Menne MJ, Smith TM, Vose RS, Zhang H-M (2017) Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature version 5 (ERSSTv5), upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J Clim 30(20):8179–8205. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1
Jin F-F, An S, Timmermann A, Zhao J (2003) Strong El Niño events and nonlinear dynamical heating. Geophys Res Lett 30(3):1120. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016356
Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang S-K, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631
Kao H-Y, Yu J-Y (2009) Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO. J Clim 22:615–632
Kirtman BP et al (2014) The North American multimodel ensemble: phase-1 seasonal-to-interannual prediction; phase-2 toward developing intraseasonal prediction. Bull Am Meteorl Soc 95:585–601
Kug J-S, Jin F-F, An S-I (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Clim 22:1499–1515. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2624.1
Kumar A, Hoerling MP (1997) Interpretation and implications of observed inter-El Niño variability. J Clim 10:83–91
Kumar A, Hu Z-Z, Jha B, Peng P (2017) Estimating ENSO predictability based on multi-model hindcasts. Clim Dyn 48(1–2):39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3060-4
L’Heureux M, Takahashi K, Watkins A, Barnston A, Becker E, Di Liberto T, Gamble F, Gottschalck J, Halpert M, Huang B, Mosquera-Vásquez K, Wittenberg A (2017) Observing and predicting the 2015–2016 El Niño. Bull Am Meteor Soc 98(7):1363–1382. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0009.1
Larkin NK, Harrison DE (2005) Global seasonal temperature and precipitation anomalies during El Niño autumn and winter. Geophys Res Lett 32:L13705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022738
Lengaigne M, Vecchi GA (2010) Contrasting the termination of moderate and extreme El Niño events in coupled general circulation models. Clim Dyn 35:299–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0562-3
Levine AFZ, McPhaden MJ (2016) How the july 2014 easterly wind burst gave the 2015-6 El Niño a head start. Geophys Res Lett 43:6503–6510. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069204
Liebmann B, Smith CA (1996) Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing long wave radiation dataset. Bull Am Meteor Soc 77:1275–1277
Lübbecke JF, Böning CW, Keenlyside NS, Xie S-P (2010) On the connection between Benguela and equatorial Atlantic Niños and the role of the South Atlantic Anticyclone. J Geophys Res 115:C09015. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005964
McPhaden MJ (2012) A 21st century shift in the relationship between ENSO SST anomalies and upper ocean heat content. Geophys Res Lett 39(9):L09706. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051826
McPhaden MJ, Zhang X (2009) Asymmetry in zonal phase propagation of ENSO sea surface temperature anomalies. Geophys Res Lett 36:L13703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038774
McPhaden MJ, Zebiak SE, Glantz MH (2006) ENSO as an integrating concept in Earth science. Science 314:1740–1745
McPhaden MJ, Timmermann A, Widlansky MJ, Balmaseda MA, Stockdale TN (2015) The curious case of the El Niño that never happened: a perspective from 40 years of progress in climate research and forecasting. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96(10):1647–1665. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00089.1
Menkes CE, Lengaigne M, Vialard J, Puy M, Marchesiello P, Cravatte S, Cambon G (2014) About the role of westerly wind events in the possible development of an El Niño in 2014. Geophys Res Lett 41:6476–6483
National Research Council (2010) Assessment of intraseasonal to interannual climate prediction and predictability. the National Academies Press, Washington, p192 ( ISBN-10: 0-309-15183-X)
Philander SGH (1990) El Niño, La Niña and the Southern Oscillation, ISBN 0125532350. Academic Press, San Diego, p 293
Rasmusson EM, Carpenter TH (1982) Variation in tropical sea surface temperature and surface wind fields associated with Southern Oscillation/El Niño. Mon Weather Rev 110:354–384
Rasmusson EM, Wallace JM (1983) Meteorological aspects of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Science 222:1195–2202
Sanabria J, Bourrel L, Dewitte B, Frappart F, Rau P, Solis O, Labat D (2018) Rainfall along the coast of Peru during strong El Niño events. Int J Climatol 38(4):1737–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5292
Sarachik ES, Cane MA (2010) The El Niño-Southern oscillation phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, London, p 384
Takahashi K, Martínez AG (2018) The very strong coastal El Niño in 1925 in the far-eastern Pacific. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3702-1
Tseng Y-H, Hu Z-Z, Ding R-Q, Chen H-C (2017) An ENSO prediction approach based on ocean conditions. Clim Dyn 48(5–6):2025–2044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3188-2
Wang B (1995) Interdecadal changes in El Niño onset in the last four decades. J Climate 8:267–285
Wang X, Tan W, Wang C (2018) A new index for identifying different types of El Niño Modoki events. Clim Dyn 50(7–8):2753–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3769-8
Wyrtki K (1975) El Niño-The dynamic response of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to atmospheric forcing. J Phys Oceanogr 5:572–584
Xie P, Arkin PA (1997) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:2539–2558
Yu J-Y, Kim ST (2011) Reversed spatial asymmetries between El Niño and La Niña and their linkage to decadal ENSO modulation in CMIP3 models. J Clim 24:5423–5434. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00024.1
Zhang X, McPhaden MJ (2006) Wind stress variations and interannual sea surface temperature anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific. J Clim 19:226–241
Zhang X, McPhaden MJ (2008) Eastern equatorial Pacific forcing of ENSO sea surface temperature anomalies. J Clim 21:6070–6079
Zhang W-J, Li J-P, Jin F-F (2009) Spatial and temporal features of ENSO meridional scales. Geophys Res Lett 36:L15605. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038672
Zhu J, Zhou G-Q, Zhang R-H, Sun Z (2011) On the role of oceanic entrainment temperature (Te) in decadal changes of El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Ann Geophys 29:529–540. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-529-2011
Acknowledgements
The authors thank reviewers for their constructive comments and insightful suggestions. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any view or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NWS, NOAA, or the Department of Commerce. This is PMEL Contribution No. 4736. B. Huang is supported by Grants from NSF (AGS-1338427), NASA (NNX14AM19G), NOAA (NA14OAR4310160 and NA17OAR4310144).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is a contribution to the special collection on ENSO Diversity. The special collection aims at improving understanding of the origin, evolution, and impacts of ENSO events that differ in amplitude and spatial patterns, in both observational and modeling contexts, and in the current as well as future climate scenarios. This special collection is coordinated by Antonietta Capotondi, Eric Guilyardi, Ben Kirtman and Sang-Wook Yeh.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, ZZ., Huang, B., Zhu, J. et al. On the variety of coastal El Niño events. Clim Dyn 52, 7537–7552 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4290-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4290-4