gms | German Medical Science

German Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DKOU 2019)

22. - 25.10.2019, Berlin

Achievable control and time-dependent loss of interfragmentary compression in simple fracture patterns in ovine bone

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Mark Heyland - Julius Wolff Institute, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Alberto Jorge Mora - Division of Trauma, Santiago University Clinical Hospital, Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Laboratory 18, Institute IDIS, Servicio Galego de Saúde, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Eran Keltz - Orthopedic Surgery Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  • Dag Wulsten - Julius Wolff Institute, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Georg Duda - Julius Wolff Institute, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Gabriele Rußow - Julius Wolff Institute, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Sven Märdian - Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2019). Berlin, 22.-25.10.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. DocAB28-1032

doi: 10.3205/19dkou159, urn:nbn:de:0183-19dkou1598

Published: October 22, 2019

© 2019 Heyland et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objectives: Absolute stability for primary fracture healing requires interfragmentary compression. In daily practice, compression pressure distribution or force are not measured [1]. Brink et al. 2013 showed that compressive forces were not sufficiently achieved in transverse olecranon fractures fixated by tension band wiring [2]. Wähnert et al. 2013 proved strong effects of relaxation of interfragmentary compression within the first hours in a low-density artificial (osteoporotic) bone model and suggest augmentation to attenuate this effect [3]. We hypothesize that compression can be controlled using different standard compression techniques such as a compression plate or an interfragmentary lag screw. Furthermore, we hypothesize that loss of interfragmentary compression through relaxation within one hour can be attenuated by auxiliary fixation such as a neutralization plate.

Methods: Ovine femora and humeri (total N=12, 6 each) were equally separated into two groups: First group (1) received a 45 degree oblique osteotomy at mid-diaphysis and was fixated using a 3.5mm lag screw and a locking compression plate (3.5mm LCP, DePuy Synthes) as neutralization plate. Second group (2) received a transverse osteotomy and was fixated using a compression plate (LCP) with eccentric placement of first 2 screws (of 6 cortical screws, (Figure 1 [Fig. 1])). Interfragmentary pressure was recorded using a Tekscan 5033 sensor.

Results and conclusion: Initial median interfragmentary compression forces in group 1 (25%/75% quartile) were 57 N (52 N/104 N), and in group 2 median forces were 37 N (23 N/ 61 N), p>0.05 (Mann-Whitney U-test). Median loss of compression over time were 3.1% in group 1 and 1.1% in group 2 within one hour (Figure 1 [Fig. 1]), p>0.05). A long term measurement of more than 12 hours of an exemplary sample from group 1 resulted in a force reduction of 5.9%.

Different individual compression levels were achieved, not significantly influenced by the method of fixation. With a lag screw, we could not monitor the whole area between the fragments, thus the resulting compression forces might even be higher in group 1 than reported. Relaxation of compression was minimal in our set-up with stiff ovine bones. However, we could confirm that lag screws placed outside of the plate before further screws (locking or non-locking) for fracture fixation may help to maintain interfragmentary compression [4] with low variation of compression force in sufficient bone quality, although additional functional loads remain to be added.


References

1.
Kellam J. Invited Commentary related to: Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Apr;31(4):213-214. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000809 External link
2.
Brink PR, Windolf M, de Boer P, Brianza S, Braunstein V, Schwieger K. Tension band wiring of the olecranon: is it really a dynamic principle of osteosynthesis? Injury. 2013 Apr;44(4):518-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.052 External link
3.
Wähnert D, Hofmann-Fliri L, Schwieger K, Brianza S, Raschke MJ, Windolf M. Cement augmentation of lag screws: an investigation on biomechanical advantages. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Mar;133(3):373-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1676-3 External link
4.
Au B, Groundland J, Stoops TK, Santoni BG, Sagi HC. Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Apr;31(4):210-213. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000769 External link