An evaluation of the Swiss staging model for hypothermia using case reports from the literature.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_9883468896F9.P001.pdf (914.58 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_9883468896F9
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
An evaluation of the Swiss staging model for hypothermia using case reports from the literature.
Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Author(s)
Deslarzes T., Rousson V., Yersin B., Durrer B., Pasquier M.
ISSN
1757-7241 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1757-7241
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
24
Number
1
Pages
16
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Case Reports ; Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Core body temperature is used to stage and guide the management of hypothermic patients, however obtaining accurate measurements of core temperature is challenging, especially in the pre-hospital context. The Swiss staging model for hypothermia uses clinical indicators to stage hypothermia. The proposed temperature range for clinical stage 1 is <35-32 °C (95-90 °F), for stage 2, <32-28 °C (<90-82 °F) for stage 3, <28-24 °C (<82-75 °F), and for stage 4 below 24 °C (75 °F). However, the evidence relating these temperature ranges to the clinical stages needs to be strengthened.
METHODS: Medline was used to retrieve data on as many cases of accidental hypothermia (core body temperature <35 °C (95 °F)) as possible. Cases of therapeutic or neonatal hypothermia and those with confounders or insufficient data were excluded. To evaluate the Swiss staging model for hypothermia, we estimated the percentage of those patients who were correctly classified and compared the theoretical with the observed ranges of temperatures for each clinical stage. The number of rescue collapses was also recorded.
RESULTS: We analysed 183 cases; the median temperature for the sample was 25.2 °C (IQR 22-28). 95 of the 183 patients (51.9%; 95% CI = 44.7%-59.2%) were correctly classified, while the temperature was overestimated in 36 patients (19.7%; 95% CI = 13.9%-25.4%). We observed important overlaps among the four stage groups with respect to core temperature, the lowest observed temperature being 28.1 °C for Stage 1, 22 °C for Stage 2, 19.3 °C for Stage 3, and 13.7 °C for stage 4.
CONCLUSION: Predicting core body temperature using clinical indicators is a difficult task. Despite the inherent limitations of our study, it increases the strength of the evidence linking the clinical hypothermia stage to core temperature. Decreasing the thresholds of temperatures distinguishing the different stages would allow a reduction in the number of cases where body temperature is overestimated, avoiding some potentially negative consequences for the management of hypothermic patients.
Keywords
Body Temperature/physiology, Cold Temperature, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Hypothermia/therapy, Models, Organizational, Rewarming/methods, Switzerland
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
04/03/2016 16:45
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:00
Usage data