The Determinants of the Preferred Walking Speed in Individuals with Obesity.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 271. FernandezMendez ObesityFacts19 PreferredWalkingSpeed Obesity.pdf (512.95 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_876FF6E574EC
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The Determinants of the Preferred Walking Speed in Individuals with Obesity.
Journal
Obesity facts
Author(s)
Fernández Menéndez A., Saubade M., Hans D., Millet G.P., Malatesta D.
ISSN
1662-4033 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1662-4025
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Number
5
Pages
543-553
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The preferred walking speed (PWS), also known as the "spontaneous" or "self-selected" walking speed, is the speed normally used during daily living activities and may represent an appropriate exercise intensity for weight reduction programs aiming to enhance a more negative energy balance.
The aim of this study was to examine, simultaneously, the energetics, mechanics, and perceived exertion determinants of PWS in individuals with obesity.
Twenty-three adults with obesity (age 32.7 ± 6.8 years, body mass index 33.6 ± 2.6 kg/m2) were recruited. The participants performed 10 min of treadmill familiarization, and PWS was determined. Each subject performed six 5-min walking trials (PWS 0.56, 0.83, 1.11, 1.39, and 1.67 m/s). Gas exchanges were collected and analyzed to obtain the gross energy cost of walking (GCw), rated perceived exertion (RPE) was measured using a 6-20 Borg scale, and the external mechanical work (Wext) and the fraction of mechanical energy recovered by the pendular mechanism (Recovery) were computed using an instrumented treadmill. Second-order least-squares regression was used to calculate the optimal walking speed (OWS) of each variable.
No significant difference was found between PWS (1.28 ± 0.13 m/s) and OWS for GCw (1.28 ± 0.10 m/s), RPE cost of walking (1.38 ± 0.14 m/s), and Recovery (1.48 ± 0.27 m/s; p > 0.06 for all), but the PWS was significantly faster than the OWS for Wext (0.98 ± 0.56 m/s; p < 0.02). Multiple regression (r = 0.72; p = 0.003) showed that ∼52% of the variance in PWS was explained by Recovery, Wext, and height.
The main finding of this study was that obese adults may select their PWS in function of several competing demands, since this speed simultaneously minimizes pendular energy transduction, energy cost, and perceived exertion during walking. Moreover, recovery of mechanical work, external work, and height seem to be the major determinants of PWS in these individuals.
Keywords
Adolescent, Adult, Body Mass Index, Energy Metabolism/physiology, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity/metabolism, Obesity/physiopathology, Obesity/psychology, Obesity/therapy, Oxygen Consumption, Patient Preference/psychology, Perception/physiology, Physical Exertion/physiology, Walking/psychology, Walking Speed/physiology, Weight Reduction Programs, Young Adult, Energy cost, External work, Perceived exertion, Recovery, Self-selected walking speed
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
13/09/2019 11:39
Last modification date
23/02/2021 8:09
Usage data