Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-36851
Titel: Meridional ocular magnification after cataract surgery with toric and non-toric intraocular lenses
VerfasserIn: Langenbucher, Achim
Hoffmann, Peter
Cayless, Alan
Wendelstein, Jascha
Bolz, Matthias
Szentmáry, Nóra
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Verlag/Plattform: Springer Nature
Erscheinungsjahr: 2022
Freie Schlagwörter: Ocular magnification
Image distortion
Aniseikonia
4 × 4 matrix calculation
Paraxial optics
Vergence formula
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Background Overall ocular magnification (OOM) and meridional ocular magnification (MOM) with consequent image distortions have been widely ignored in modern cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate OOM and MOM in a general situation with an astigmatic refracting surface. Methods From a large dataset containing biometric measurements (IOLMaster 700) of both eyes of 9734 patients prior to cataract surgery, the equivalent (PIOLeq) and cylindric power (PIOLcyl) were derived for the HofferQ, Haigis, and Castrop formulae for emmetropia. Based on the pseudophakic eye model, OOM and MOM were extracted using 4 × 4 matrix algebra for the corrected eye (with PIOLeq/PIOLcyl (scenario 1) or with PIOLeq and spectacle correction of the residual refractive cylinder (scenario 2) or with PIOLeq remaining the residual uncorrected refractive cylinder (blurry image) (scenario 3)). In each case, the relative image distortion of MOM/OOM was calculated in %. Results On average, PIOLeq/PIOLcyl was 20.73 ± 4.50 dpt/1.39 ± 1.09 dpt for HofferQ, 20.75 ± 4.23 dpt/1.29 ± 1.01 dpt for Haigis, and 20.63 ± 4.31 dpt/1.26 ± 0.98 dpt for Castrop formulae. Cylindric refraction for scenario 2 was 0.91 ± 0.70 dpt, 0.89 ± 0.69 dpt, and 0.89 ± 0.69 dpt, respectively. OOM/MOM (× 1000) was 16.56 ± 1.20/0.08 ± 0.07, 16.56 ± 1.20/0.18 ± 0.14, and 16.56 ± 1.20/0.08 ± 0.07 mm/mrad with HofferQ; 16.64 ± 1.16/0.07 ± 0.06, 16.64 ± 1.16/0.18 ± 0.14, and 16.64 ± 1.16/0.07 ± 0.06 mm/mrad with Haigis; and 16.72 ± 1.18/0.07 ± 0.05, 16.72 ± 1.18/0.18 ± 0.14, and 16.72 ± 1.18/0.07 ± 0.05 mm/mrad with Castrop formulae. Mean/95% quantile relative image distortion was 0.49/1.23%, 0.41/1.05%, and 0.40/0.98% for scenarios 1 and 3 and 1.09/2.71%, 1.07/2.66%, and 1.06/2.64% for scenario 2 with HofferQ, Haigis, and Castrop formulae. Conclusion Matrix representation of the pseudophakic eye allows for a simple and straightforward prediction of OOM and MOM of the pseudophakic eye after cataract surgery. OOM and MOM could be used for estimating monocular image distortions, or differences in overall or meridional magnifications between eyes.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.1007/s00417-022-05740-4
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00417-022-05740-4
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-368518
hdl:20.500.11880/33478
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-36851
ISSN: 1435-702X
0721-832X
Datum des Eintrags: 18-Jul-2022
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Augenheilkunde
Professur: M - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dipl.-Ing. Achim Langenbucher
M Prof. Dr. med. Nóra Szentmáry
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Langenbucher2022_Article_MeridionalOcularMagnificationA.pdf2,96 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons