KIT | KIT-Bibliothek | Impressum | Datenschutz

Behavioral variation in Tullock contests

Masiliunas, Aidas; Mengel, Friederike; Reiss, J. Philipp

Abstract:

We conduct an experiment to uncover the reasons behind the typically large behavioral variation and low explanatory power of Nash equilibrium observed in Tullock contests. In our standard contest treatment, only 7% of choices are consistent with Nash equilibrium which is in line with the literature and roughly what random (uniform) choice would predict (6.25%). We consider a large class of social, risk and some other non-standard preferences and show that heterogeneity in preferences cannot explain these results. We then systematically vary the complexity of both components of Nash behaviour: (I) the difficulty to form correct beliefs and (II) the difficulty to formulate best responses. In treatments where both the difficulty of forming correct beliefs and of formulating best responses is reduced behavioural variation decreases substantially and the explanatory behaviour of Nash equilibrium increases dramatically (explaining 65% of choices with a further 20% being close to NE). Our results show that bounded rationality rather than heterogeneity in preferences is the reason behind the huge behavioral variation typically observed in Tullock contests.


Volltext §
DOI: 10.5445/IR/1000038522
Cover der Publikation
Zugehörige Institution(en) am KIT Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre (ECON)
Publikationstyp Forschungsbericht/Preprint
Publikationsjahr 2014
Sprache Englisch
Identifikator ISSN: 2190-9806
urn:nbn:de:swb:90-385226
KITopen-ID: 1000038522
Verlag Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Serie Working paper series in economics ; 55
Schlagwörter rent-seeking, contests, behavioural variation, Nash equilibrium, complexity
KIT – Die Forschungsuniversität in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
KITopen Landing Page