独特性之后:法庭科学意见的演进 (After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions)

Details

Ressource 1Download: Thompson_etla_2018_EvidenceScience.pdf (2715.71 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_BD79C38F1BAE
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
独特性之后:法庭科学意见的演进 (After uniqueness: the evolution of forensic science opinions)
Journal
Evidence Science
Author(s)
Thompson William, Vuille Joëlle, Taroni Franco, Biedermann Alex
Translator(s)
Wang Henry Zhuhao
ISSN
1674-1226
Publication state
Published
Issued date
25/08/2018
Volume
26
Number
4
Pages
503-513
Language
chinese
Notes
Vuille and Biedermann gratefully acknowledge the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation through grants no. PZ00P1_154955/1 and BSSGI0_155809. Thompson gratefully acknowledges support from the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE).
Abstract
Big Changes are occurring in forensic science, particularly among experts who compare the patterns found in fingerprints, footwear impressions, toolmarks, handwriting, and the like. Forensic examiners are reaching conclusions in new ways and changing the language they use in reports and testimony. This article explains these changes and the challenges they pose for lawyers and judges.
Keywords
Forensic science, Expert, Pattern-matching disciplines, Certainty and probability, Likelihood ratio, error rate
Create date
17/10/2018 11:29
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:31
Usage data