Pooled analyses of eribulin in metastatic breast cancer patients with at least one prior chemotherapy.

Details

Ressource 1Download: mdw203.pdf (263.00 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_43D394D01C9D
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Pooled analyses of eribulin in metastatic breast cancer patients with at least one prior chemotherapy.
Journal
Annals of oncology
Author(s)
Pivot X., Marmé F., Koenigsberg R., Guo M., Berrak E., Wolfer A.
ISSN
1569-8041 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0923-7534
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
27
Number
8
Pages
1525-1531
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Based on data from two multicenter, phase III clinical trials (Studies 301 and 305), eribulin (a microtubule dynamics inhibitor) is indicated in the European Union (EU) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after ≥1 prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, including an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Data from Studies 305 and 301 were pooled to investigate the efficacy of eribulin in various subgroups of patients who matched the EU label, including those with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative and triple-negative disease.
In Study 305 (NCT00388726), patients were randomized 2:1 to eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m(2) (equivalent to eribulin 1.23 mg/m(2) [expressed as free base]) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days] or treatment of physician's choice after 2-5 prior chemotherapies (≥2 for advanced disease), including an anthracycline and a taxane (in early/advanced setting). In Study 301 (NCT00337103), patients were randomized 1:1 to eribulin (as above) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days) following ≤3 prior chemotherapies (≤2 for advanced disease), including an anthracycline and a taxane. Efficacy end points were investigated in the intent-to-treat population and subgroups, pooled as discussed above.
Overall, 1644 patients were included (eribulin: 946; control: 698); baseline characteristics were well matched. Overall survival was significantly longer with eribulin versus control (P < 0.01), as were progression-free survival and clinical benefit rate (both P < 0.05). Significant survival benefits with eribulin versus control were observed in a wide range of patient subgroups, including HER2-negative or triple-negative disease (all P < 0.05).
Our findings underline the survival benefit achieved by eribulin used according to EU label in the overall MBC population and in various subgroups of interest, including patients with HER2-negative and triple-negative disease.

Keywords
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic, Anthracyclines/adverse effects, Anthracyclines/therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use, Bridged-Ring Compounds/administration & dosage, Bridged-Ring Compounds/adverse effects, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Furans/adverse effects, Furans/therapeutic use, Humans, Ketones/adverse effects, Ketones/therapeutic use, Neoplasm Metastasis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors, Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics, Taxoids/administration & dosage, Taxoids/adverse effects, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology, clinical trial, eribulin, metastatic breast cancer, pooled analysis, survival, triple-negative breast cancer
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
02/12/2016 14:48
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:47
Usage data