Estimating the risk of developing type 2 diabetes: a comparison of several risk scores: the Cohorte Lausannoise study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 21636799_BIB_1D2B14929DF7.pdf (638.37 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_1D2B14929DF7
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Estimating the risk of developing type 2 diabetes: a comparison of several risk scores: the Cohorte Lausannoise study.
Journal
Diabetes care
Author(s)
Schmid R., Vollenweider P., Waeber G., Marques-Vidal P.
ISSN
1935-5548 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0149-5992
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Number
8
Pages
1863-1868
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To compare in the Swiss population the results of several scores estimating the risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
This was a single-center, cross-sectional study conducted between 2003 and 2006 in Lausanne, Switzerland. Overall, 3,251 women and 2,937 men, aged 35-75 years, were assessed, of which 5,760 (93%) were free from diabetes and included in the current study. The risk of developing type 2 diabetes was assessed using seven different risk scores, including clinical data with or without biological data. Participants were considered to be eligible for primary prevention according to the thresholds provided for each score. The results were then extrapolated to the Swiss population of the same sex and age.
The risk of developing type 2 diabetes increased with age in all scores. The prevalence of participants at high risk ranged between 1.6 and 24.9% in men and between 1.1 and 15.7% in women. Extrapolated to the Swiss population of similar age, the overall number of participants at risk, and thus susceptible to intervention, ranged between 46,708 and 636,841. In addition, scores that included the same clinical variables led to a significantly different prevalence of participants at risk (4.2% [95% CI 3.4-5.0] vs. 12.8% [11.5-14.1] in men and 2.9% [2.4-3.6] vs. 6.0% [5.2-6.9] in women). CONCLUSIONS; The prevalence of participants at risk for developing type 2 diabetes varies considerably according to the scoring system used. To adequately prevent type 2 diabetes, risk-scoring systems must be validated for each population considered.

Keywords
Adult, Aged, Body Height, Body Weight, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism, Female, Humans, Life Style, Lipids/blood, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
23/06/2011 17:18
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:53
Usage data