Robust discrimination between EEG responses to categories of environmental sounds in early coma.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_11B99A7AD615.P001.pdf (1010.22 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_11B99A7AD615
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Robust discrimination between EEG responses to categories of environmental sounds in early coma.
Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Author(s)
Cossy N., Tzovara A., Simonin A., Rossetti A.O., De Lucia M.
ISSN
1664-1078 (Electronic)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Volume
5
Number
155
Pages
1-13
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: epublish
Abstract
Humans can recognize categories of environmental sounds, including vocalizations produced by humans and animals and the sounds of man-made objects. Most neuroimaging investigations of environmental sound discrimination have studied subjects while consciously perceiving and often explicitly recognizing the stimuli. Consequently, it remains unclear to what extent auditory object processing occurs independently of task demands and consciousness. Studies in animal models have shown that environmental sound discrimination at a neural level persists even in anesthetized preparations, whereas data from anesthetized humans has thus far provided null results. Here, we studied comatose patients as a model of environmental sound discrimination capacities during unconsciousness. We included 19 comatose patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) during the first 2 days of coma, while recording nineteen-channel electroencephalography (EEG). At the level of each individual patient, we applied a decoding algorithm to quantify the differential EEG responses to human vs. animal vocalizations as well as to sounds of living vocalizations vs. man-made objects. Discrimination between vocalization types was accurate in 11 patients and discrimination between sounds from living and man-made sources in 10 patients. At the group level, the results were significant only for the comparison between vocalization types. These results lay the groundwork for disentangling truly preferential activations in response to auditory categories, and the contribution of awareness to auditory category discrimination.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
19/03/2014 14:04
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:39
Usage data